We now prove that . To simplify the computation, we will use the notation
|
|
|
where is a real number, and we note here that is increasing.
The starting point is a precise formula for . This is just Yau’s estimate [Y1], but without assuming that the metrics
and are equivalent, and it is done
in a more general setting in [TWY] (see also [PSS]). With the notation of [TWY] we can write
|
|
|
We then choose local unitary
frames for and
for , and write
|
|
|
|
|
|
for some local matrices of functions . Notice that at any given point we can choose the frames and arrange that
| (3.34) |
|
|
|
| (3.35) |
|
|
|
Then in our case [TWY, (4.3)] reads
| (3.36) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where we are summing over all indices, represents the curvature of and its covariant derivative (with respect to ). Since these are fixed tensors, we can use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and (3.34), (3.35) to estimate the first term on the right hand side of (3.36) by
|
|
|
The second and third term in (3.36) are estimated similarly, while the fourth term can be bounded by
|
|
|
Overall we can estimate
| (3.37) |
|
|
|
On the other hand from [TWY, Lemma 3.3] we see that
| (3.38) |
|
|
|
We now insert (3.29), (3.30) in (3.37), (3.38) and get
| (3.39) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We then compute
| (3.40) |
|
|
|
and estimate
|
|
|
Using [TWY, (3.20)] we see that
|
|
|
On the other hand a direct computation using (3.14) and (3.15) shows that there is a constant such that for any real number we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
and so we have
| (3.41) |
|
|
|
This and (3.39) give
|
|
|
and
| (3.42) |
|
|
|
At the maximum of we then get
|
|
|
which implies that
|
|
|
and so
|
|
|
if we choose .
∎