Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.
Denote by the smooth volume form on given by
which satisfies . We can write where , . The following argument to show that actually for some is similar to Lemma 3.2 in [EGZ]. First of all is smooth, nonnegative, and vanishes precisely on the exceptional set of . Fixing local coordinates on a polydisc and a local embedding , we see that is comparable to
on . But this is in turn comparable to
where the are holomorphic functions on , and so for some small that depends on the vanishing orders of the . Then
| (4.2) |
The compactness of gives , and so we can apply Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 3.1 of [EGZ] (which rely on the seminal work of Kołodziej [Koł]) to get a unique continuous such that
| (4.3) |
and . Moreover we can see that descends to a function on : if is a fiber of , the restriction of to is a plurisubharmonic function, because . Desingularizing and applying the maximum principle we see that has to be constant, and so descends to . Since by construction is the pullback of a (singular) Kähler form on , we see that is a singular Ricci-flat metric on , in the terminology of [EGZ]. On , the closed positive current clearly lies in the class and has continuous potentials. Intuitively, our goal is to get estimates in the open set where is positive. This can be done rigorously in the following way, which was first used by H.Tsuji [Ts] (see also [TZ], [CL] for a recent revisiting of his approach). Since is nef and big, by Kodaira’s lemma (Example 2.2.19 in [L]) there exists effective Cartier divisor such that for all small enough, is Kähler. We’ll show that is smooth on , and so is a smooth Ricci-flat metric there, and that the Ricci-flat metrics converge to in the topology on compact sets of . Notice that the metric on cannot be complete, since its diameter is finite by the result in section 3. Our argument is very similar to the proof of Theorem 3.5 in [EGZ] (see also [Y2]). Once this is proved, we can repeat the argument for any other given by Kodaira’s lemma, and by uniqueness we see that is smooth off , the intersection of the supports of all such . We claim that is equal to the null locus of , and by Nakamaye’s Theorem all we need to show is that it is equal to the augmented base locus of . If is a point outside the augmented base locus, then there exist an ample divisor and large enough so that is not in the base locus of . But this means that where is an effective divisor that doesn’t pass through , and moreover the cohomology class of is Kähler. So we can take and , and we see that is contained in the null locus of . Conversely, if belongs to the null locus, then there exists a subvariety through with and . Since the potentials for the current are continuous, the self-intersection is a well-defined closed positive current [BT], which restricts to a nonnegative Borel measure on . The integral is then equal to the cohomological intersection number (see e.g. Corollary 9.3 in [De2]) which is zero. But if is not in then is smooth and Kähler near and the volume of with respect to would be positive, which is a contradiction.