ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

Denote by Ω\Omega the smooth volume form on XX given by

Ω=ω0n∫Xω0n,\Omega=\frac{\omega_{0}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{n}},

which satisfies ∫XΩ=1\int_{X}\Omega=1. We can write Ω=F​ωn,\Omega=F\omega^{n}, where F∈L1​(ωn)F\in L^{1}(\omega^{n}), F>0F>0. The following argument to show that actually F∈Lp​(ωn)F\in L^{p}(\omega^{n}) for some p>1p>1 is similar to Lemma 3.2 in [EGZ]. First of all 1/F1/F is smooth, nonnegative, and vanishes precisely on the exceptional set of ff. Fixing local coordinates (zi)(z^{i}) on a polydisc D⊂XD\subset X and a local embedding G:f⁡(D)→ℂmG:f(D)\to\mathbb{C}^{m}, we see that 1/F1/F is comparable to

|∂G∂z1∧⋯∧∂G∂zn|2\left|\frac{\partial G}{\partial z^{1}}\wedge\dots\wedge\frac{\partial G}{\partial z^{n}}\right|^{2}

on DD. But this is in turn comparable to

∑i=1r|gi|2,\sum_{i=1}^{r}|g_{i}|^{2},

where the gig_{i} are holomorphic functions on DD, and so Fε∈L1​(D,Ω)F^{\varepsilon}\in L^{1}(D,\Omega) for some small ε>0\varepsilon>0 that depends on the vanishing orders of the gig_{i}. Then

(4.2) ∫DF1+ε​ωn=∫DFε​Ω<∞.\int_{D}F^{1+\varepsilon}\omega^{n}=\int_{D}F^{\varepsilon}\Omega<\infty.

The compactness of XX gives F∈L1+ε​(ωn)F\in L^{1+\varepsilon}(\omega^{n}), and so we can apply Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 3.1 of [EGZ] (which rely on the seminal work of Kołodziej [Koł]) to get a unique continuous φ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)\varphi\in PSH(X,\omega) such that

(4.3) (ω+−1​∂∂¯​φ)n=αn​Ω,(\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\varphi)^{n}=\alpha^{n}\Omega,

and supXφ=0\sup_{X}\varphi=0. Moreover we can see that φ\varphi descends to a function on YY: if VV is a fiber of ff, the restriction of φ\varphi to VV is a plurisubharmonic function, because ω|V=0\omega|_{V}=0. Desingularizing VV and applying the maximum principle we see that φ|V\varphi|_{V} has to be constant, and so φ\varphi descends to YY. Since ω\omega by construction is the pullback of a (singular) Kähler form on YY, we see that ω+−1​∂∂¯​φ\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\varphi is a singular Ricci-flat metric on YY, in the terminology of [EGZ]. On XX, the closed positive current ω1=ω+−1​∂∂¯​φ\omega_{1}=\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\varphi clearly lies in the class α\alpha and has continuous potentials. Intuitively, our goal is to get estimates in the open set where ω\omega is positive. This can be done rigorously in the following way, which was first used by H.Tsuji [Ts] (see also [TZ], [CL] for a recent revisiting of his approach). Since LL is nef and big, by Kodaira’s lemma (Example 2.2.19 in [L]) there exists EE effective Cartier divisor such that for all ε>0\varepsilon>0 small enough, α−ε​E=κε\alpha-\varepsilon E=\kappa_{\varepsilon} is Kähler. We’ll show that φ\varphi is smooth on X\EX\backslash E, and so ω1\omega_{1} is a smooth Ricci-flat metric there, and that the Ricci-flat metrics ωt\omega_{t} converge to ω1\omega_{1} in the C∞C^{\infty} topology on compact sets of X\EX\backslash E. Notice that the metric ω1\omega_{1} on X\EX\backslash E cannot be complete, since its diameter is finite by the result in section 3. Our argument is very similar to the proof of Theorem 3.5 in [EGZ] (see also [Y2]). Once this is proved, we can repeat the argument for any other EE given by Kodaira’s lemma, and by uniqueness we see that ω1\omega_{1} is smooth off E′E^{\prime}, the intersection of the supports of all such EE. We claim that E′E^{\prime} is equal to the null locus of LL, and by Nakamaye’s Theorem all we need to show is that it is equal to the augmented base locus of LL. If x∈Xx\in X is a point outside the augmented base locus, then there exist HH an ample divisor and k,mk,m large enough so that xx is not in the base locus of m​L−mk​HmL-\frac{m}{k}H. But this means that m​L−mk​H∼NmL-\frac{m}{k}H\sim N where NN is an effective divisor that doesn’t pass through xx, and moreover the cohomology class of L−1m​NL-\frac{1}{m}N is Kähler. So we can take ε=1m\varepsilon=\frac{1}{m} and E=NE=N, and we see that E′E^{\prime} is contained in the null locus of LL. Conversely, if xx belongs to the null locus, then there exists a subvariety VV through xx with dimV=k\dim V=k and (Lk⋅V)=0(L^{k}\cdot V)=0. Since the potentials for the current ω1\omega_{1} are continuous, the self-intersection ω1k\omega_{1}^{k} is a well-defined closed positive current [BT], which restricts to a nonnegative Borel measure on VV. The integral ∫Vω1k\int_{V}\omega_{1}^{k} is then equal to the cohomological intersection number (Lk⋅V)(L^{k}\cdot V) (see e.g. Corollary 9.3 in [De2]) which is zero. But if xx is not in E′E^{\prime} then ω1\omega_{1} is smooth and Kähler near xx and the volume of VV with respect to ω1\omega_{1} would be positive, which is a contradiction.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.