Remark 2.24 . [03NK]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Remark 2.24.
As in §2.5, in the embedded case, the Fukaya category has objects for an embedded Lagrangian brane and a bounding cochain, but the derived Fukaya category has objects twisted complexes, consisting of objects in together with for satisfying an equation.
In the immersed case, we can regard such a twisted complex as a single object in , where is the disjoint union , considered as a single immersed Lagrangian, , and is a bounding cochain for built from and for . Thus there is no need to add twisted complexes, and we can suppose all objects of are of the form .
The idempotent completion of as in §2.5 could still include objects which are direct summands of some , but do not have a good geometric interpretation. However, in §3.1 we will conjecture that in the situation we are interested in, is already idempotent complete, so that we can take all objects of to be of the form .