ScalingStacks

Proof. [03BX]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Since formal and algebraic metrics are the same as noted in Remark 2.5 and hence also the same as piecewise linear metrics, we deduce from Proposition 2.10 (d) that ∥⁣∥\|\ \| is an algebraic metric. If the given metrics are semipositive in xx, then it remains to prove that ∥⁣∥\|\ \| is semipositive in xx. By base change again, we may assume that KK is algebraically closed. By Lemma 3.6, we may assume that XX is a proper variety over KK.

Let us pick models ℒ1{\mathscr{L}}_{1}, ℒ2{\mathscr{L}}_{2} and ℒ{\mathscr{L}} of LL defining the model metrics ∥⁣∥\|\ \|, ∥∥1\|\ \|_{1} and ∥∥2\|\ \|_{2}. There is a K∘{K^{\circ}}-model 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} of XX on which ℒ1{\mathscr{L}}_{1}, ℒ2{\mathscr{L}}_{2} and ℒ{\mathscr{L}} are determined. There is an open neighbourhood WW of xx in Xan{X^{\rm an}} such that ∥∥1{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{1} and ∥∥2{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{2} are semipositive in all points of WW. We will show that ∥⁣∥{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|} is semipositive in every point of WW. By [GK15, 6.5], it is equivalent to show that degℒ⁡(C)≥0\deg_{\mathscr{L}}(C)\geq 0 for any closed curve CC of 𝒳s{\mathscr{X}}_{s} contained in the reduction of WW. Moreover, the same result yields that ℒ1{\mathscr{L}}_{1} and ℒ2{\mathscr{L}}_{2} restrict to nef line bundles on CC. By [GK15, Theorem 4.1], there is a closed curve YY in XX such that CC is an irreducible component of the special fibre of the closure Y¯\overline{Y} in 𝒳{\mathscr{X}}. By restriction, we may assume that X=YX=Y is a curve and hence CC is an irreducible component of 𝒳s{\mathscr{X}}_{s}. Let 𝔛{\mathfrak{X}} be the formal completion of 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} and let 𝔏,𝔏1,𝔏2{\mathfrak{L}},{\mathfrak{L}}_{1},{\mathfrak{L}}_{2} be the line bundles on 𝔛{\mathfrak{X}} induced by the pull-backs of ℒ,ℒ1,ℒ2{\mathscr{L}},{\mathscr{L}}_{1},{\mathscr{L}}_{2}.

We have seen in the proof of Proposition 3.5 that we can associate to 𝔛{\mathfrak{X}} a canonical formal model 𝔛′{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime} of Xan{X^{\rm an}} with reduced special fibre and a canonical finite surjective morphism ι:𝔛′→𝔛\iota:{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathfrak{X}}. So there is a closed curve C′C^{\prime} in 𝔛s′{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime}_{s} which maps onto CC in 𝔛s=𝒳s{\mathfrak{X}}_{s}={\mathscr{X}}_{s}. Let 𝔏′,𝔏1′,𝔏2′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime},{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime},{\mathfrak{L}}_{2}^{\prime} be the line bundles on 𝔛′{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime} given by pull-back of 𝔏,𝔏1,𝔏2{\mathfrak{L}},{\mathfrak{L}}_{1},{\mathfrak{L}}_{2}. Note that 𝔏′,𝔏1′,𝔏2′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime},{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime},{\mathfrak{L}}_{2}^{\prime} are formal models of the metrics ∥∥,∥∥1,∥∥2{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|},{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{1},{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{2} on Lan{L^{\rm an}}. By projection formula, the line bundles 𝔏1′,𝔏2′{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime},{\mathfrak{L}}_{2}^{\prime} restrict to nef line bundles on C′C^{\prime} and it remains to show that

(3.11.1) deg𝔏′⁡(C′)≥0.\deg_{{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}}(C^{\prime})\geq 0.

Let ζ\zeta be the generic point of C′C^{\prime}. Then there is a unique point ξ\xi in Xan{X^{\rm an}} with reduction ζ\zeta. This follows from [Ber90, Proposition 2.4.4] since ζ\zeta has a formal affine open neighbourhood in 𝔛′{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime} of the form Spf⁡(𝒜∘){\rm Spf}({\mathscr{A}}^{\circ}) for a strictly KK-affinoid algebra 𝒜{\mathscr{A}}. Using ∥∥=min(∥∥1,∥∥2)\|\ \|=\min(\|\ \|_{1},\|\ \|_{2}), we may assume ∥∥(ξ)=∥∥1(ξ){\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}(\xi)={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{1}(\xi). Since Lan{L^{\rm an}} is algebraic, there is a non-trivial meromorphic section tt of 𝔏′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}. Note that the restriction of tt to the generic fibre Lan{L^{\rm an}} induces also a meromorphic section t1t_{1} of 𝔏1′{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime}. The meromorphic section t/t1t/t_{1} of 𝔐:=𝔏′⊗(𝔏1′)−1{\mathfrak{M}}:={\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}\otimes({\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime})^{-1} restricts to the trivial section 11 of 𝒪Xan{\mathcal{O}}_{X^{\rm an}} and we have

‖t/t1‖𝔐=‖t‖/‖t1‖1=‖t‖/‖t‖1≤1.\|t/t_{1}\|_{\mathfrak{M}}=\|t\|/\|t_{1}\|_{1}=\|t\|/\|t\|_{1}\leq 1.

By [Gub98, Proposition 7.5], we deduce that t/t1t/t_{1} is a global section of 𝔐\mathfrak{M}. The definition of formal metrics and ‖t/t1‖𝔐​(ξ)=‖t‖​(ξ)/‖t‖1​(ξ)=1\|t/t_{1}\|_{\mathfrak{M}}(\xi)=\|t\|(\xi)/\|t\|_{1}(\xi)=1 yield that {y∈Xan∣‖t/t1‖𝔐​(y)≥1}\{y\in{X^{\rm an}}\mid\|t/t_{1}\|_{\mathfrak{M}}(y)\geq 1\} is the generic fibre of a formal open neighbourhood 𝔘{\mathfrak{U}} of ζ\zeta. Hence [Gub98, Proposition 7.5] again shows that t/t1t/t_{1} is a nowhere vanishing regular section of 𝔐\mathfrak{M} on 𝔘{\mathfrak{U}}. We conclude that the restriction of the global section t/t1t/t_{1} to C′C^{\prime} is not identically zero inducing an effective Cartier divisor DD on C′C^{\prime}. This shows

deg𝔐⁡(C′)=degD⁡(C′)≥0.\deg_{\mathfrak{M}}(C^{\prime})=\deg_{D}(C^{\prime})\geq 0.

Using that 𝔏1′{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime} is nef on C′C^{\prime} and 𝔏′=𝔐⊗𝔏1′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}={\mathfrak{M}}\otimes{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime}, we get

deg𝔏′⁡(C′)≥deg𝔏1′⁡(C′)≥0\deg_{{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}}(C^{\prime})\geq\deg_{{\mathfrak{L}}_{1}^{\prime}}(C^{\prime})\geq 0

proving (3.11.1). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.