ScalingStacks

Proof. [03BV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The proof follows mainly the arguments in [GK15, Proposition 6.4]. By Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 3.4, we may assume that KK is algebraically closed and that VV is reduced. Let (𝔙,𝔏)({\mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{L}}) be a formal K∘{K^{\circ}}-model of (V,L)(V,L) with ∥∥=∥∥𝔏{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{L}}. We assume that ∥⁣∥{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|} is semipositive in every x∈Vx\in V. We choose a closed curve CC in 𝔙s{\mathfrak{V}}_{s} which is proper over K~{\tilde{K}}. We have to show that deg𝔏⁡(C)≥0\deg_{\mathfrak{L}}(C)\geq 0. By surjectivity of the reduction map π:V→𝔙s\pi:V\to{\mathfrak{V}}_{s}, there is x∈Vx\in V such that π⁡(x)\pi(x) is the generic point of CC. Since ∥⁣∥{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|} is semipositive in xx, there is a compact strictly KK-affinoid neighborhood WW of xx and a nef formal K∘{K^{\circ}}-model (𝔚,𝔐)({\mathfrak{W}},{\mathfrak{M}}) of (W,L|W)(W,L|_{W}) such that ∥∥=∥∥𝔐{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{M}} over WW. Using Proposition 3.5, we may always replace the models 𝔚{\mathfrak{W}} and 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}} by dominating formal K∘{K^{\circ}}-models and the line bundles 𝔐{\mathfrak{M}} and 𝔏{\mathfrak{L}} by their pull-backs. By [BL93b, Corollary 5.4], we may therefore assume that 𝔚{\mathfrak{W}} is a formal open subset of 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}}. Then 𝔏|𝔚{\mathfrak{L}}|_{\mathfrak{W}} is also a formal K∘{K^{\circ}}-model of L|WL|_{W} and hence Proposition 3.5 shows that 𝔏|𝔚{\mathfrak{L}}|_{\mathfrak{W}} is nef.

Since WW is a neighbourhood of xx and since VV is boundaryless, we conclude that the boundary of WW is the topological boundary of WW in VV (see [Ber90, Corollary 2.5.13(ii), Proposition 3.1.3(ii)]). In particular, xx is no boundary point of WW as WW is a neighborhood of xx. Using [CD12, Lemma 6.5.1], such interior points are characterized by the property that the closure of the reduction in 𝔚s{\mathfrak{W}}_{s} is proper over K~{\tilde{K}}. We conclude that the closure of π⁡(x)\pi(x) in 𝔚s{\mathfrak{W}}_{s} is equal to CC. Since 𝔏|𝔚{\mathfrak{L}}|_{\mathfrak{W}} is nef, it follows that deg𝔏⁡(C)≥0\deg_{\mathfrak{L}}(C)\geq 0. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.