ScalingStacks

Proof. [03AZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Clearly, every formal metric is piecewise linear. To prove the converse, we may assume that VV is connected. It is a general fact from topology (see [Bou71, chap. 1, §9, Théorème 5]) that a connected locally compact space is paracompact if and only if it is countable at infinity. It follows that there is a finite or a countable G{\rm G}-open covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} of VV of finite type by strictly KK-affinoid domains ViV_{i} with frames sis_{i} of L|ViL|_{V_{i}} such that ‖si‖=1\|s_{i}\|=1 on ViV_{i}. Then ViV_{i} is the Berkovich spectrum of a strictly KK-affinoid algebra 𝒜i{\mathscr{A}}_{i}. Obviously, there is an admissible K∘{K^{\circ}}-algebra AiA_{i} with 𝒜i=Ai⊗K∘K{\mathscr{A}}_{i}=A_{i}\otimes_{K^{\circ}}K. For fi∈𝒜i∘f_{i}\in{\mathscr{A}}_{i}^{\circ}, the K∘{K^{\circ}}-algebra Ai​[fi]A_{i}[f_{i}] is

an admissible K∘{K^{\circ}}-algebra [Bos14, Lemma 8.4.6].

Using the existence of a formal metric on LanL^{\rm an}, we may assume that L=𝒪VL={\mathcal{O}}_{V} and hence the frames sis_{i} are invertible functions on the sets ViV_{i}. Using that VV is paracompact, the underlying rigid space is quasiseparated and hence Vi​j=Vi∩Vj=Spf⁡(𝒜i​j)V_{ij}=V_{i}\cap V_{j}={\rm Spf}({\mathscr{A}}_{ij}) for some strictly KK-affinoid algebra 𝒜i​j{\mathscr{A}}_{ij}. If fi​j=si/sjf_{ij}=s_{i}/s_{j}, then fi​j∈(𝒜i​j∘)×f_{ij}\in({\mathscr{A}}_{ij}^{\circ})^{\times}. Using the above, we choose a formal affine K∘{K^{\circ}}-model 𝔚i​j{\mathfrak{W}}_{ij} with generic fiber Vi​jV_{ij} such that fi​j∈𝒪⁡(𝔚i​j)f_{ij}\in{\mathcal{O}}({\mathfrak{W}}_{ij}).

In the following, we assume that I=ℕ∖{0}I={\mathbb{N}}\setminus\{0\} (the finite case is similar and even easier) and we consider k∈ℕk\in{\mathbb{N}}. By an inductive procedure, we will construct a formal model 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)} of VV such that ViV_{i} is the generic fiber of a formal open subset 𝔙i(k){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k)} of 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)} for every i∈Ii\in I and such that 𝔙i(k)∩𝔙j(k){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k)}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{j}^{(k)} is lying over 𝔚i​j{\mathfrak{W}}_{ij} for every i,j∈{0,…,k}i,j\in\{0,\dots,k\}. By this we mean that for every i,j∈{0,…,k}i,j\in\{0,\dots,k\} there exists a morphism 𝔙i(k)∩𝔙j(k)→𝔚i​j{\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k)}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{j}^{(k)}\to{\mathfrak{W}}_{ij} which is the identity on the generic fibre.

Note that the case k=0k=0 follows from [Bos14, Lemma 8.4.5]. Let k≥1k\geq 1 and assume that 𝔙(k−1){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k-1)} is already constructed. By Raynaud’s theorem and [BL93b, Corollary 5.4], there is an admissible formal blowing up pkp_{k} of 𝔙k(k−1){\mathfrak{V}}_{k}^{(k-1)} such that Vi​kV_{ik} (resp. Vk​iV_{ki}) is the generic fiber of a formal open subset lying over 𝔚i​k{\mathfrak{W}}_{ik} (resp. 𝔚k​i{\mathfrak{W}}_{ki}) for i=1,…,ki=1,\dots,k. By [Bos14, Proposition 8.2.13], we may extend pkp_{k} to an admissible formal blowing up 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)} of 𝔙(k−1){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k-1)} with center ZZ in the special fiber such that ZZ is disjoint from every 𝔙i(k−1){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k-1)} with i≤k−1i\leq k-1 satisfying 𝔙i(k−1)∩𝔙k(k−1)=∅{\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k-1)}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{k}^{(k-1)}=\emptyset. Then 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)} satisfies the claim with 𝔙i(k){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k)} equal to the preimage of 𝔙i(k−1){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(k-1)} in 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)}.

Using that the G\rm G-covering (Vi)i∈I(V_{i})_{i\in I} is of finite type, the above construction shows that the formal models 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)} eventually become stable over 𝔙i(0){\mathfrak{V}}_{i}^{(0)} for any i∈Ii\in I and hence we get a formal model 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}} of VV lying above all the models 𝔙(k){\mathfrak{V}}^{(k)}. It has the property that every ViV_{i} is the generic fiber of a formal open subset 𝔙i{\mathfrak{V}}_{i} and that 𝔙i∩𝔙j{\mathfrak{V}}_{i}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{j} is lying over 𝔚i​j{\mathfrak{W}}_{ij} for every i,j∈Ii,j\in I. Since fi​jf_{ij} and fj​if_{ji} are both in 𝒪⁡(𝔙i∩𝔙j){\mathcal{O}}({\mathfrak{V}}_{i}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{j}), we see that fi​jf_{ij} is invertible on 𝔙i∩𝔙j{\mathfrak{V}}_{i}\cap{\mathfrak{V}}_{j}. This means that (si)i∈I(s_{i})_{i\in I} is a vertical Cartier divisor on 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}} inducing the metric. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.