ScalingStacks

Proof. [03AD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We use the notation of [BPS14, §3.5]. Let 𝒳Λ\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda} be the affine toric scheme associated to Λ\Lambda. The ring of functions of 𝒳Λ\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda} is

K∘​[𝒳Λ]=K∘​[M~Λ]/(χ(0,1)−ϖ).K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]=K^{\circ}[\widetilde{M}_{\Lambda}]/(\chi^{(0,1)}-\varpi).

The orbit O⁡(Λ)O(\Lambda) is a closed subscheme of 𝒳Λ\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}. If u∈{relint}⁡(Λ)u\in\rint(\Lambda), the ideal of O⁡(Λ)O(\Lambda) is the ideal generated by the monomials χ(m,l)\chi^{(m,l)} with (m,l)∈M~Λ(m,l)\in\widetilde{M}_{\Lambda} and ⟨m,u⟩+l>0\langle m,u\rangle+l>0.

The generic fiber of 𝒳Λ\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda} is the affine toric variety X{rec}⁡(Λ)={Spec}⁡(K⁡[M{rec}⁡(Λ)])X_{\rec(\Lambda)}=\Spec(K[M_{\rec(\Lambda)}]). The natural inclusion K∘​[𝒳Λ]⊂K⁡[M{rec}⁡(Λ)]K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]\subset K[M_{\rec(\Lambda)}] is given by χ(m,l)↦ϖl​χm\chi^{(m,l)}\mapsto\varpi^{l}\chi^{m}. Any point p∈X{rec}⁡(Λ)anp\in X_{\rec(\Lambda)}^{{\mathrm{an}}} determines a seminorm on K∘​[𝒳Λ]K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]. The set of points of X{rec}⁡(Λ)anX^{{\mathrm{an}}}_{\rec(\Lambda)} whose reduction belongs to 𝒳Λ\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda} is

C={p∈X{rec}⁡(Λ)an∣|f(p)|≤1,∀f∈K∘[𝒳Λ]}.C=\{p\in X^{{\mathrm{an}}}_{\rec(\Lambda)}\mid|f(p)|\leq 1,\ \forall f\in K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]\}.

Given a point p∈Cp\in C, then red⁡(p){\mathrm{red}}(p) is the point corresponding to the prime ideal

𝔮p={f∈K∘​[𝒳Λ]∣|f⁡(p)|<1}.\mathfrak{q}_{p}=\{f\in K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]\mid|f(p)|<1\}.

Every f∈K∘​[𝒳Λ]f\in K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}] can be written as a sum

f=∑(m,l)∈M~Λα(m,l)​χ(m,l),f=\sum_{(m,l)\in\widetilde{M}_{\Lambda}}\alpha_{(m,l)}\chi^{(m,l)},

with |α(m,l)|=0,1|\alpha_{(m,l)}|=0,1 and only a finite number of coefficients α(m,l)\alpha_{(m,l)} different from zero.

By the definition of ζK\zeta_{K},

𝔮ζK​(u)\displaystyle\mathfrak{q}_{\zeta_{K}(u)} ={∑α(m,l)​χ(m,l)∈K∘​[𝒳Λ]||ϖ|l​e−λK​⟨m,u⟩<1}\displaystyle=\left\{\sum\alpha_{(m,l)}\chi^{(m,l)}\in K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]\,\middle|\,|\varpi|^{l}e^{-\lambda_{K}\langle m,u\rangle}<1\right\}
={∑α(m,l)​χ(m,l)∈K∘​[𝒳Λ]|⟨m,u⟩+l>0}.\displaystyle=\left\{\sum\alpha_{(m,l)}\chi^{(m,l)}\in K^{\circ}[\mathscr{X}_{\Lambda}]\,\middle|\,\langle m,u\rangle+l>0\right\}.

Since u∈{relint}⁡(Λ)u\in\rint(\Lambda), we deduce that 𝔮ζK​(u)\mathfrak{q}_{\zeta_{K}(u)} is the ideal of O⁡(Λ)O(\Lambda) and therefore red⁡(ζK​(u))=ξΛ.{\mathrm{red}}(\zeta_{K}(u))=\xi_{\Lambda}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.