ScalingStacks

Proof. [039F]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

To prove (a), we pick any projective RR-model 𝒴{\mathscr{Y}} of YY. By [Lü93, Lemma 2.2], there is a blowing up π:𝒳′→𝒴⊗RK∘\pi\colon{{\mathscr{X}}}^{\prime}\to{\mathscr{Y}}\otimes_{R}K^{\circ} such that 𝒳′{{\mathscr{X}}}^{\prime} dominates 𝒳{{\mathscr{X}}}. Since π\pi is a projective morphism, 𝒳′{{\mathscr{X}}}^{\prime} is a projective K∘K^{\circ}-model dominating 𝒳{{\mathscr{X}}}. Hence (a) follows from (b).

To prove (b), we note that the morphism 𝒳→𝒴⊗RK∘{{\mathscr{X}}}\to{\mathscr{Y}}\otimes_{R}K^{\circ} is a blowing up morphism along a vertical closed subscheme ZZ of 𝒴⊗RK∘{\mathscr{Y}}\otimes_{R}K^{\circ} (see [Liu06, Thm. 8.1.24]). Since the ideal sheaf of ZZ contains a power of the uniformizer of RR, we may define it over RR and hence the same is true for the blowing up morphism and for 𝒳{{\mathscr{X}}} proving (b).

To prove (c), we may assume that the model function is associated to a vertical Cartier divisor DD. Replacing DD by D+div⁡(λ)D+{\operatorname{div}}(\lambda) for a suitable non-zero λ∈R\lambda\in R and using (a) and (b), we may assume that DD is an effective Cartier divisor on a projective RR-model 𝒴{\mathscr{Y}} of YY. As in (b), we see that the ideal sheaf of DD is defined by the ideal sheaf of a Cartier divisor D0D_{0} defined over RR proving (c). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.