ScalingStacks

Proposition 2.9 . [038A]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proposition 2.9.

Let u,u′∈C0​(Xan)u,u^{\prime}\in C^{0}(X^{\mathrm{an}}) and θ,θ′∈𝒵1,1​(X)\theta,\theta^{\prime}\in\mathcal{Z}^{1,1}(X).

  1. (i)

    If u≤u′u\leq u^{\prime} then Pθ​(u)≤Pθ​(u′){P}_{\theta}(u)\leq{P}_{\theta}(u^{\prime}).

  2. (ii)

    We have Pt​θ+(1−t)​θ′​(t​u+(1−t)​u′)≥t​Pθ​(u)+(1−t)​Pθ′​(u′){P}_{t\theta+(1-t)\theta^{\prime}}(tu+(1-t)u^{\prime})\geq t{P}_{\theta}(u)+(1-t){P}_{\theta^{\prime}}(u^{\prime}) for all t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1].

  3. (iii)

    We have Pθ​(u)+c=Pθ​(u+c){P}_{\theta}(u)+c={P}_{\theta}(u+c) for each c∈ℝc\in\mathbb{R}.

  4. (iv)

    We have Pθ​(u)−v=Pθ+d​dc​v​(u−v){P}_{\theta}(u)-v={P}_{\theta+dd^{c}v}(u-v) for each v∈𝒟⁡(X)v\in{\mathscr{D}}(X).

  5. (v)

    If Pθ​(u)≢−∞{P}_{\theta}(u)\not\equiv-\infty, then we have supXan|Pθ​(u)−Pθ​(u′)|≤supXan|u−u′|\sup_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}|{P}_{\theta}(u)-{P}_{\theta}(u^{\prime})|\leq\sup_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}|u-u^{\prime}|.

  6. (vi)

    If θ\theta is determined on a model 𝒳{{\mathscr{X}}}, if the de Rham class {θ}\{\theta\} is ample and if θm→θ\theta_{m}\to\theta in N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({{\mathscr{X}}}/S), then Pθm​(u)→Pθ​(u)P_{\theta_{m}}(u)\to{P}_{\theta}(u) uniformly on XanX^{\mathrm{an}}.

  7. (vii)

    We have Pt​θ​(t​u)=t​Pθ​(u){P}_{t\theta}(tu)=t{P}_{\theta}(u) for all t∈ℝ>0t\in\mathbb{R}_{>0}.

  8. (viii)

    Assume Pθ​(u)≢−∞{P}_{\theta}(u)\not\equiv-\infty. Then the envelope Pθ​(u)P_{\theta}(u) is continuous if and only if it is a uniform limit of θ\theta-psh model functions.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.