Next we wish to use the equation satisfied by :
|
|
|
Take derivative with respect to on both sides, we obtain:
|
|
|
Plugging this into equation (4.4), we have
| (4.5) |
|
|
|
In the above, , etc are just usual derivatives taken under the coordinate as specified above.
Notice that there will be no more terms like , because the choice makes such terms exactly cancel out.
Now we proceed further from (4.5).
As preparation, we observe that for any :
| (4.6) |
|
|
|
First we can estimate as follows, with various constants depending only on , , and the curvature bound of the original metric .
| (4.7) |
|
|
|
| (4.8) |
|
|
|
In the second line of above estimate, we used (4.6) to estimate the extra powers of .
The conjugate term will satisfy the same estimate as above.
| (4.9) |
|
|
|
Finally
| (4.10) |
|
|
|
Now combining the estimates in (4.7), (4.8), (4.9), (4.10), we obtain from (4.5):
| (4.11) |
|
|
|
Note that , hence has a positive uniform lower bound since is bounded from below. Here is some constant depending only on , , and the curvature bound of the original metric .
In order to handle the second term on the right hand side, we need to consider .
For this we can recall our calculation in (3.6):
| (4.12) |
|
|
|
Let be a constant, we combine (4.11), (4.12), and conclude:
| (4.13) |
|
|
|
First we choose , and calculate:
| (4.14) |
|
|
|
Hence there exists a constant , with the same dependence as said above, such that
| (4.15) |
|
|
|
Set
|
|
|
we obtain the key estimate from here:
| (4.16) |
|
|
|
Next we plan to do iteration, using (4.16).
Notice that for any :
| (4.17) |
|
|
|
Integrate over , we obtain:
| (4.18) |
|
|
|
Plug in the key estimate (4.16), we get:
| (4.19) |
|
|
|
Or equivalently:
| (4.20) |
|
|
|
Observe that , . Hence for some constant , we have
| (4.21) |
|
|
|
Since , and is bounded, we see
| (4.22) |
|
|
|
Fix to be determined, we estimate the right hand side of (4.22):
| (4.23) |
|
|
|
Denote , then (4.22) now becomes:
| (4.24) |
|
|
|
We estimate the left hand side of (4.24) from below:
| (4.25) |
|
|
|
Integrate and use Holder inequality, we get:
| (4.26) |
|
|
|
Therefore, for , we may apply (4.24) to get:
| (4.27) |
|
|
|
Here
| (4.28) |
|
|
|
Apply the Sobolev embedding with exponent , and denote to be the improved integrability, we get
|
|
|
Recall that , this means:
| (4.29) |
|
|
|
Here has the same dependence as ’s above, but with additional dependence on .
From the 1st line to 2nd line, we used (4.27).
Now choose small so that , then above estimate indeed improves integrability, namely we need
| (4.30) |
|
|
|
We fix and (4.29) gives for :
| (4.31) |
|
|
|
Denote , and choose , for . Then we obtain:
| (4.32) |
|
|
|
It follows that
| (4.33) |
|
|
|
From above we get estimate of in terms of .
But recall , so estimate is available.