ScalingStacks

Proof. [0210]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

One start by calculating:

(3.2) Δφ​(e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(n+CLOSECLOSEOPENOPENΔ​φ))=Δφ​(e−α⁡(F+λ​φ))​(n+Δ​φ)+e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​Δφ​(n+Δ​φ)+e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(−α)​(Fi+λ​φi)​(Δ​φ)i¯+(Fi¯+λ​φi¯)​(Δ​φ)i1+φi​i¯.\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(n+&\Delta\varphi))=\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)})(n+\Delta\varphi)+e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}\Delta_{\varphi}(n+\Delta\varphi)\\ &+e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(-\alpha)\frac{(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i})(\Delta\varphi)_{\bar{i}}+(F_{\bar{i}}+\lambda\varphi_{\bar{i}})(\Delta\varphi)_{i}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.\end{split}

If we choose λ>2​supR​i​c\lambda>2\sup Ric, then

(3.3) Δφ(e−α⁡(F+λ​φ))=α2​|Fi+λ​φi|21+φi​i¯​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)+α​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(R¯−λ​n+∑iλ−Ri​i¯1+φi​i¯)≥α2​|Fi+λ​φi|21+φi​i¯​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)+α​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(R¯−λ​n)+λ​α2​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​∑i11+φi​i¯.\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}&(e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)})=\frac{\alpha^{2}|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}+\alpha e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\underline{R}-\lambda n+\sum_{i}\frac{\lambda-R_{i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}})\\ &\geq\frac{\alpha^{2}|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}+\alpha e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\underline{R}-\lambda n)+\frac{\lambda\alpha}{2}e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.\end{split}

For the term Δφ​(n+Δ​φ)\Delta_{\varphi}(n+\Delta\varphi), we choose a normal coordinate (c.f. equation (2.1)) and then follow Yau’s calculation[35]. First, note that

(3.4) Δφ​(n+Δ​φ)=11+φk​k¯​(gi​j¯​φi​j¯)k​k¯=Ri​i¯​k​k¯​φi​i¯1+φk​k¯+φk​k¯​i​i¯1+φk​k¯.\Delta_{\varphi}(n+\Delta\varphi)=\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}}}\bigg(g^{i\bar{j}}\varphi_{i\bar{j}}\bigg)_{k\bar{k}}=\frac{R_{i\bar{i}k\bar{k}}\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}}}+\frac{\varphi_{k\bar{k}i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}}}.

We wish to represent the 44-th derivative of φ\varphi in terms of FF. For this we take equation (1.1) and differentiate it twice in ziz_{i}, zi¯z_{\bar{i}} and then sum over i=1,2⋯n.i=1,2\cdots n.\; We obtain:

(3.5) φk​k¯​i​i¯1+φk​k¯−Rk​k¯​i​i¯1+φk​k¯−|φk​β¯​i|2(1+φk​k¯)​(1+φβ​β¯)=Fi​i¯−Ri​i¯.\frac{\varphi_{k\bar{k}i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}}}-\frac{R_{k\bar{k}i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}}}-\frac{|\varphi_{k\bar{\beta}i}|^{2}}{(1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}})(1+\varphi_{\beta\bar{\beta}})}=F_{i\bar{i}}-R_{i\bar{i}}.

Hence

(3.6) Δφ​(nCLOSEOPEN+Δ​φ)=Rk​k¯​i​i¯​(1+φk​k¯)1+φi​i¯+|φp​q¯​i|2(1+φp​p¯)​(1+φq​q¯)+Δ​F−R≥−C3.1(n+Δφ)∑i11+φi​i¯+|φp​q¯​i|2(1+φp​p¯)​(1+φq​q¯)+ΔF−R.\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}(n&+\Delta\varphi)=\frac{R_{k\bar{k}i\bar{i}}(1+\varphi_{k\bar{k}})}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{p\bar{q}i}|^{2}}{(1+\varphi_{p\bar{p}})(1+\varphi_{q\bar{q}})}+\Delta F-R\\ &\geq-C_{3.1}(n+\Delta\varphi)\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{p\bar{q}i}|^{2}}{(1+\varphi_{p\bar{p}})(1+\varphi_{q\bar{q}})}+\Delta F-R.\end{split}

Here C3.1C_{3.1} depends only on curvature bound of gg and RR is the scalar curvature of the background metric gg. Plug in to equation (3.2) and we get

(3.7) Δφ(e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(n+Δ​φ))≥e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(λ​α2−C3.1)​(n+Δ​φ)​∑i11+φi​i¯+α​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(R¯−λ​n)​(n+Δ​φ)+e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(Δ​F−R).\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}&(e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(n+\Delta\varphi))\geq e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\frac{\lambda\alpha}{2}-C_{3.1})(n+\Delta\varphi)\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\\ &+\alpha e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\underline{R}-\lambda n)(n+\Delta\varphi)+e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\Delta F-R).\end{split}

Here we already drop the term:

α2​|Fi+λ​φi|21+φi​i¯​(n+Δ​φ)+(−α)​(Fi+λ​φi)​(Δ​φ)i¯+(Fi¯+λ​φi¯)​(Δ​φ)i1+φi​i¯+|φp​q¯​i|2(1+φp​p¯)​(1+φq​q¯)≥α2​|Fi+λ​φi|21+φi​i¯​(n+Δ​φ)−2​α​R​e​((Fi+λ​φi)​(Δ​φ)i¯1+φi​i¯)+|(Δ​φ)i|2(n+Δ​φ)​(1+φi​i¯)=n+Δ​φ1+φi​i¯​|α⁡(Fi+λ​φi)−(Δ​φ)in+Δ​φ|2≥0.\begin{split}&\frac{\alpha^{2}|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}(n+\Delta\varphi)+(-\alpha)\frac{(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i})(\Delta\varphi)_{\bar{i}}+(F_{\bar{i}}+\lambda\varphi_{\bar{i}})(\Delta\varphi)_{i}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{p\bar{q}i}|^{2}}{(1+\varphi_{p\bar{p}})(1+\varphi_{q\bar{q}})}\\ \quad\geq&\frac{\alpha^{2}|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}(n+\Delta\varphi)-2\alpha Re\bigg(\frac{(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i})(\Delta\varphi)_{\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\bigg)+\frac{|(\Delta\varphi)_{i}|^{2}}{(n+\Delta\varphi)(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})}\\ =&\frac{n+\Delta\varphi}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}|\alpha(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i})-\frac{(\Delta\varphi)_{i}}{n+\Delta\varphi}|^{2}\geq 0.\end{split}

From the first line to second line in the above, we observed that

|(Δ​φ)i|21+φi​i¯=|∑pφp​p¯​i|21+φi​i¯≤|φp​p¯​i|2​(n+Δ​φ)(1+φi​i¯)​(1+φp​p¯)≤|φp​q¯​i|2​(n+Δ​φ)(1+φp​p¯)​(1+φq​q¯).\frac{|(\Delta\varphi)_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}=\frac{|\sum_{p}\varphi_{p\bar{p}i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\leq\frac{|\varphi_{p\bar{p}i}|^{2}(n+\Delta\varphi)}{(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})(1+\varphi_{p\bar{p}})}\\ \leq\frac{|\varphi_{p\bar{q}i}|^{2}(n+\Delta\varphi)}{(1+\varphi_{p\bar{p}})(1+\varphi_{q\bar{q}})}.

Set

u=e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(n+Δ​φ)u=e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(n+\Delta\varphi)

and note that

(n+Δ​φ)​∑i11+φi​i¯≥e−Fn−1​(n+Δ​φ)1+1n−1,(n+\Delta\varphi)\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\geq e^{-\frac{F}{n-1}}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{1+\frac{1}{n-1}},

then we know from equation (3.7):

(3.8) Δφu≥e−(α+1n−1)​F−α​λ​φ​(λ​α2−C3.1)​(n+Δ​φ)1+1n−1−α​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(λ​n−R¯)​(n+Δ​φ)+e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(Δ​F−R).\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}&u\geq e^{-(\alpha+\frac{1}{n-1})F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(\frac{\lambda\alpha}{2}-C_{3.1})(n+\Delta\varphi)^{1+\frac{1}{n-1}}-\alpha e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\lambda n-\underline{R})(n+\Delta\varphi)\\ &\qquad\qquad+e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(\Delta F-R).\end{split}

We use the following equality, which holds for any p≥0p\geq 0:

12​p+1​Δφ​(u2​p+1)=2​p​u2​p−1​|∇φu|φ2+u2​p​Δφ​u=2​p​u2​p−2​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)​(n+Δ​φ)​|∇φu|φ2+u2​p​Δφ​u≥2​p​u2​p−2​|∇u|2​e−α⁡(F+λ​φ)+u2​p​Δφ​u.\begin{array}[]{lcl}{1\over{2p+1}}\Delta_{\varphi}(u^{2p+1})&=&2pu^{2p-1}|\nabla_{\varphi}u|_{\varphi}^{2}+u^{2p}\Delta_{\varphi}u\\ &=&2pu^{2p-2}e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}(n+\Delta\varphi)|\nabla_{\varphi}u|_{\varphi}^{2}+u^{2p}\Delta_{\varphi}u\\ &\geq&2pu^{2p-2}|\nabla u|^{2}e^{-\alpha(F+\lambda\varphi)}+u^{2p}\Delta_{\varphi}u.\end{array}

Integrate with respect to d​v​o​lφ=eF​d​v​o​lgdvol_{\varphi}=e^{F}dvol_{g} and plug inequality (3.8) to get:

(3.9) ∫M2​p​u2​p−2​|∇u|2​e(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Me−(α−n−2n−1)​F−α​λ​φ(λ​α2−C3.1)(n+Δφ)1+1n−1u2​pdvolg+∫Me(1−α)​F−α​λ​φu2​pΔFdvolg≤∫Mαe(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ(λn−R¯)(n+Δφ)u2​pdvolg+∫Me(1−α)​F−λ​α​φRu2​pdvolg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}2pu^{2p-2}|\nabla u|^{2}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad+\int_{M}e^{-(\alpha-\frac{n-2}{n-1})F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(\frac{\lambda\alpha}{2}-C_{3.1})(n+\Delta\varphi)^{1+\frac{1}{n-1}}u^{2p}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\qquad+\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}\Delta Fdvol_{g}\leq\int_{M}\alpha e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(\lambda n-\underline{R})(n+\Delta\varphi)u^{2p}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad+\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}Ru^{2p}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

We need to handle the term involving Δ​F\Delta F, which is done by integrating by parts.

(3.10) ∫Me(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​u2​p​Δ​F​𝑑v​o​lg=∫M(α−1)​e(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​u2​p​|∇F|2​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Mαλe(1−α)​F−λ​α​φu2​p∇φ⋅∇Fdvolg−∫M2pe(1−α)​F−λ​α​φu2​p−1∇u⋅∇Fdvolg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}\Delta Fdvol_{g}=\int_{M}(\alpha-1)e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}dvol_{g}\\ &+\int_{M}\alpha\lambda e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}\nabla\varphi\cdot\nabla Fdvol_{g}-\int_{M}2pe^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p-1}\nabla u\cdot\nabla Fdvol_{g}.\end{split}

Also we can estimate the last term of (3.10)

(3.11) u2​p−1∇u⋅∇F≤12u2​p−2|∇u|2+12u2​p|∇F|2.u^{2p-1}\nabla u\cdot\nabla F\leq\frac{1}{2}u^{2p-2}|\nabla u|^{2}+\frac{1}{2}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}.

Then we estimate the second to last term of (3.10) and obtain:

(3.12) αλe(1−α)​F−λ​α​φu2​p∇φ⋅∇F≤α−12​e(1−α)​F−λ​α​φ​u2​p​|∇F|2+α2​λ22​(α−1)​u2​p​|∇φ|2​e(1−α)​F−λ​α​φ≤α−12​e(1−α)​F−λ​α​φ​u2​p​|∇F|2+C2.3​α2​λ22​(α−1)​u2​p​e(2−α)​F−λ​α​φ.\begin{split}\alpha&\lambda e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}\nabla\varphi\cdot\nabla F\\ \leq&\frac{\alpha-1}{2}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}+\frac{\alpha^{2}\lambda^{2}}{2(\alpha-1)}u^{2p}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}\\ \leq&\frac{\alpha-1}{2}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}+C_{2.3}\frac{\alpha^{2}\lambda^{2}}{2(\alpha-1)}u^{2p}e^{(2-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}.\end{split}

When estimating |∇φ|2|\nabla\varphi|^{2} above, we used Theorem 2.2, and C2.3C_{2.3} is the constant given by that theorem. Plug (3.11), (3.12) back into (3.10), we obtain

(3.13) ∫Me(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​u2​p​Δ​F​𝑑v​o​lg≥∫M(α−12−p)​e(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​u2​p​|∇F|2​𝑑v​o​lg−∫MC2.3α2​λ22​(α−1)e(2−α)​F−λ​α​φu2​pdvolg−∫Mpe(1−α)​F−λ​α​φu2​p−2|∇u|2dvolg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}\Delta Fdvol_{g}\geq\int_{M}(\frac{\alpha-1}{2}-p)e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}dvol_{g}\\ &-\int_{M}C_{2.3}\frac{\alpha^{2}\lambda^{2}}{2(\alpha-1)}e^{(2-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}dvol_{g}-\int_{M}pe^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p-2}|\nabla u|^{2}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

Plug (3.13) back to (3.9), we see

(3.14) ∫Mp​e(1−α)​F−λ​α​φ​u2​p−2​|∇u|2​𝑑v​o​lg+∫M(α−12−p)​e(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​u2​p​|∇F|2​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Me−(α−n−2n−1)​F−α​λ​φ(λ​α2−C3.1)(n+Δφ)1+1n−1u2​pdvolg≤∫Mα​e(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​(λ​n−R¯)​(n+Δ​φ)​u2​p​𝑑v​o​lg+C2.3​α2​λ22​(α−1)​∫Me(2−α)​F−λ​α​φ​u2​p​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Me(1−α)​F−λ​α​φRu2​pdvolg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}pe^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p-2}|\nabla u|^{2}dvol_{g}+\int_{M}(\frac{\alpha-1}{2}-p)e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}u^{2p}|\nabla F|^{2}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\qquad+\int_{M}e^{-(\alpha-\frac{n-2}{n-1})F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(\frac{\lambda\alpha}{2}-C_{3.1})(n+\Delta\varphi)^{1+\frac{1}{n-1}}u^{2p}dvol_{g}\\ &\leq\int_{M}\alpha e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(\lambda n-\underline{R})(n+\Delta\varphi)u^{2p}dvol_{g}+C_{2.3}\frac{\alpha^{2}\lambda^{2}}{2(\alpha-1)}\int_{M}e^{(2-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\qquad+\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}Ru^{2p}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

Now let α>2​p+1\alpha>2p+1 and λ​α≥2​C3.1+1\lambda\alpha\geq 2C_{3.1}+1, note that n+Δ​φn+\Delta\varphi has positive lower bound, then we find from above:

(3.15) ∫Me−(α−n−2n−1)​F−α​λ​φ​(n+Δ​φ)1+1n−1​u2​p​𝑑v​o​lg≤C3.2​α​∫Me(1−α)​F−α​λ​φ​(n+Δ​φ)​u2​p​dv​o​lg+C3.2​α2α−1​∫Me(2−α)​F−λ​α​φ​u2​p​dv​o​lg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}e^{-(\alpha-\frac{n-2}{n-1})F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{1+\frac{1}{n-1}}u^{2p}dvol_{g}\\ &\qquad\leq C_{3.2}\alpha\int_{M}e^{(1-\alpha)F-\alpha\lambda\varphi}(n+\Delta\varphi)u^{2p}dvol_{g}+C_{3.2}\frac{\alpha^{2}}{\alpha-1}\int_{M}e^{(2-\alpha)F-\lambda\alpha\varphi}u^{2p}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

Recall the definition of uu, this means for any p≥0p\geq 0, α≥2​p+2\alpha\geq 2p+2:

(3.16) ∫Mexp⁡(−(2​p+1)​α​F+n−2n−1​F−λ​α​(2​p+1)​φ)​(n+Δ​φ)2​p+1+1n−1​𝑑v​o​lg≤C3.2​α​∫Mexp⁡(−(2​p+1)​α​F+F−(2​p+1)​α​λ​φ)​(n+Δ​φ)2​p+1​𝑑v​o​lg+C3.2α2α−1∫Mexp(−(2p+1)αF+2F−(2p+1)λφ)(n+Δφ)2​pdvolg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+\frac{n-2}{n-1}F-\lambda\alpha(2p+1)\varphi)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p+1+\frac{1}{n-1}}dvol_{g}\\ &\leq C_{3.2}\alpha\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+F-(2p+1)\alpha\lambda\varphi)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p+1}dvol_{g}\\ &+C_{3.2}\frac{\alpha^{2}}{\alpha-1}\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+2F-(2p+1)\lambda\varphi)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

Hence for some constant C3.3C_{3.3} which depends on ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0}, α\alpha, and pp, we get:

(3.17) ∫Mexp⁡(−(2​p+1)​α​F+n−2n−1​F)​(n+Δ​φ)2​p+1+1n−1​𝑑v​o​lg≤C3.3​(∫Mexp⁡(−(2​p+1)​α​F+F)​(n+Δ​φ)2​p+1​𝑑v​o​lgCLOSE+∫Mexp(−(2p+1)αF+2F)(n+Δφ)2​pdvolg).\begin{split}&\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+\frac{n-2}{n-1}F)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p+1+\frac{1}{n-1}}dvol_{g}\\ &\leq C_{3.3}\bigg(\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+F)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p+1}dvol_{g}\\ &+\int_{M}\exp(-(2p+1)\alpha F+2F)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p}dvol_{g}\bigg).\end{split}

Start from p=0p=0, and take α=2\alpha=2, one obtains from (3.17) that:

(3.18) ∫Me−nn−1​F(n+Δ​φ)nn−1​𝑑v​o​lg≤C3.3​(∫Me−F​(n+Δ​φ)​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Md​v​o​lg)≤C3.3​(n​‖e−F‖0​v​o​l​(M)+v​o​l​(M)).\begin{split}\int_{M}e^{-\frac{n}{n-1}F}&(n+\Delta\varphi)^{\frac{n}{n-1}}dvol_{g}\leq C_{3.3}\big(\int_{M}e^{-F}(n+\Delta\varphi)dvol_{g}+\int_{M}dvol_{g}\big)\\ &\leq C_{3.3}\big(n||e^{-F}||_{0}vol(M)+vol(M)\big).\end{split}

Since we obtained in Proposition 2.1 a bound for e−Fe^{-F} depending only on ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0} and curvature bound of gg. Hence we get a bound for ∫Me−nn−1​F​(n+Δ​φ)nn−1​𝑑v​o​lg\int_{M}e^{-\frac{n}{n-1}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{\frac{n}{n-1}}dvol_{g}.

We now claim that there exists a sequence of pair of positive numbers (pk,γk)(p_{k},\gamma_{k}) where pk→∞p_{k}\rightarrow\infty such that

∫Me−γk​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1​𝑑v​o​lg<∞\displaystyle\int_{M}\;e^{-\gamma_{k}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}+1}\;dvol_{g}<\infty

for all k=1,2⋯.k=1,2\cdots. Now we explain how we choose this sequence of pairs of positive numbers successively: In general, suppose we already choose (pk,γk)(p_{k},\gamma_{k}) such that the preceding inequality holds. Choose αk+1\alpha_{k+1} sufficiently large such that

αk+1≥2​pk+2,and−(2​pk+1)​αk+1+2≤−γk.\alpha_{k+1}\geq 2p_{k}+2,\qquad{\rm and}\qquad-(2p_{k}+1)\alpha_{k+1}+2\leq-\gamma_{k}.

Set α=αk+1\alpha=\alpha_{k+1}, p=pkp=p_{k} in (3.17), we obtain

(3.19) ∫Mexp⁡(−(2​pk+1)​αk+1​F+n−2n−1​F)​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1+1n−1​𝑑v​o​lg≤C3.31​(∫Me−γk​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1​𝑑v​o​lg+∫Me−γk​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk​𝑑v​o​lg)≤C3.32​∫Me−γk​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1​dv​o​lg.\begin{split}&\int_{M}\exp(-(2p_{k}+1)\alpha_{k+1}F+\frac{n-2}{n-1}F)(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}+1+\frac{1}{n-1}}dvol_{g}\\ &\leq C_{3.31}\bigg(\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{k}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}+1}dvol_{g}+\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{k}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}}dvol_{g}\bigg)\\ &\leq C_{3.32}\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{k}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}+1}dvol_{g}.\end{split}

In the second inequality, we used again the fact that e−Fe^{-F} is bounded in terms of ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0} and gg. In the last inequality above, we noticed the fact that n+Δ​φ≥eFnn+\Delta\varphi\geq e^{\frac{F}{n}}, and eFe^{F} is bounded from below. Set

γk+1=(2​pk+1)​αk+1−n−2n−1andpk+1=pk+12​(n−1).\gamma_{k+1}=(2p_{k}+1)\alpha_{k+1}-\frac{n-2}{n-1}\qquad{\rm and}\qquad p_{k+1}=p_{k}+\frac{1}{2(n-1)}.

Then

∫Me−γk+1​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1+1​𝑑v​o​lg≤C​∫Me−γk​F​(n+Δ​φ)2​pk+1.\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{k+1}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k+1}+1}dvol_{g}\leq C\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{k}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{2p_{k}+1}.

where the constant depends on ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0} and the background metric gg. Our claim is then verified.

By induction, we then get a bound for ∫Me−γp​F​(n+Δ​φ)p​𝑑v​o​lg\int_{M}e^{-\gamma_{p}F}(n+\Delta\varphi)^{p}dvol_{g} for any p>0p>0 and some constant γp>0\gamma_{p}>0. Here γp\gamma_{p} grows like p2p^{2} as p→∞p\rightarrow\infty. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.