2. Some facts from algebraic geometry [00FD]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2. Some facts from algebraic geometry
In this section we will review some definitions and results from algebraic geometry, mainly from Mori’s Program, that will be used in the proof.
Let be a compact Calabi-Yau fold, that is a compact Kähler manifold of dimension and such that in . We don’t insist that is simply connected. Notice that it follows that for some integer : in fact by Theorem 1 in [Be] a finite unramified cover of , , has trivial canonical bundle. But we have that and then Lemma 16.2 in [BHPV] implies that . This can be rewritten as where indicates -linear equivalence of Cartier -divisors. For the rest of this section we will assume that is projective.
Definition 2.1.
A projective variety has canonical singularities if it is normal, if is Cartier for some and if there exists a resolution such that
where ranges over all exceptional prime divisors of , and .
Definition 2.2 (Wilson [W1]).
A Calabi-Yau model is a normal projective variety with canonical singularities and such that .
Let be a nef line bundle on , and let be its Iitaka dimension, that is
and if has no sections for all . We call its numerical dimension, that is the largest nonnegative integer such that there exists an cycle such that . It is always true that
Definition 2.3.
If we say that is good (or abundant). If the complete linear system is base-point-free for some we say is semiample.
When is base-point-free, we get a morphism . Notice that if is big, that is , then it is automatically good. The following is an immediate consequence of the base-point-free Theorem (Theorem 6.1.11 in [KMM]).
Theorem 2.1 (Kawamata).
Assume is a projective Calabi-Yau. If is good then it is semiample.
The next theorem is classical (see Theorem 2.1.33 in [L]).
Theorem 2.2 (Iitaka).
Let be semiample. Then there exists a surjective morphism where is a normal irreducible variety, , and for some ample line bundle on . In fact for all sufficiently divisible.
We’ll call the contraction map of . We also have the following theorem (Theorem 5.7 in [Ka1] or Theorem 1.9 in [Ka2]).
Theorem 2.3 (Kawamata).
Assume is a projective Calabi-Yau. Then the subcone of given by nef and big classes is locally rational polyhedral.
If is a line bundle, its stable base locus is the intersection of the base loci of for all . It is equal to the base locus of for some (see Prop. 2.1.21 in [L]). If now is nef and big, we define the augmented base locus of , , to be the stable base locus of for any ample divisor and any small enough rational number.
This definition is well-posed (see Lemma 10.3.1 in [L]) and a theorem of Nakamaye ([N], [L]) says that is equal to the null locus of , that is the union of all
positive-dimensional subvarieties such that .
Finally let us state a well-known conjecture (see 10.3 of Peternell’s lectures in [MP]).
Conjecture 2.1.
Assume is a projective Calabi-Yau. If is a nef line bundle, then is semiample.
If is effective, this conjecture follows from the log abundance conjecture. Indeed for any small rational , the pair is klt, and the log abundance conjecture would imply that is semiample.