5. W 2 , 1 Regularity [04U8]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5. Regularity
In this section we obtain regularity for singular solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation. Furthermore, by examining the examples in the previous section
we show that we cannot improve this result to regularity for an depending on and .
The following result of Savin, De Philippis and Figalli (see [DFS]) gives regularity of solutions to in
compactly contained sections:
Theorem 5.1.
Assume that
|
|
|
Then for some depending only on and .
regularity then follows from our main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 1.2:.
Theorem 5.1 gives local regularity on .
By Theorem 1.1, for any we can cover
by balls such that
|
|
|
Let . Since is a convex function, the second derivatives are controlled by . It follows that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where is the Lipschitz constant of . This shows that the second derivatives cannot concentrate on .
∎
We now examine the integrability of for the examples constructed in the previous section. On any ball , by Hölder’s inequality we have
|
|
|
Recall that the subsolutions grow like in the direction, and that
these functions touch by below at any . It follows that
|
|
|
for any . Applying convexity,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix small and cover with balls of radius . Take a Vitali subcover . It follows that
|
|
|
Taking above, we conclude that
|
|
|
where the expression on the right goes to as because the Hausdorff dimension of is .
Thus, is not for .
Remark 5.2.
In future work we intend to present a more precise version of Theorem 1.1 which gives regularity of second derivatives of
singular solutions to .