3. Affine manifolds with singularities [02Z9]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
3. Affine manifolds with singularities
To deal with singular fibres, we define
Definition 3.1.
A (tropical, integral) affine manifold with singularities is a manifold with an open subset which carries a (tropical, integral) affine structure, and such that is a locally finite union of locally closed submanifolds of codimension .
Here we will give a relatively simple construction of such affine manifolds with singularities; a broader class of examples is given in [22]; see also [39] and [40].
Let be a reflexive polytope in , where . This means that is a lattice polytope with a unique interior integral point , and the polar dual polytope
is also a lattice polytope.
Let , and let be a decomposition of into lattice polytopes, i.e., is a set of lattice polytopes contained in such that (1) ; (2) implies lies in and is a face of both and ; (3) if , any face of lies in .
We now define a structure of integral affine manifold with singularities on , with discriminant locus defined as follows. Let denote the first barycentric subdivision of and let be the union of all simplices of not containing a vertex of (a zero-dimensional cell) or intersecting the interior of a maximal cell of . Setting , we define an affine structure on as follows. has an open cover
where , the interior of , and
is the (open) star of in . We define an affine chart
given by the inclusion of in , the affine hyperplane containing . Also, take to be the projection. One checks easily that for , is integral affine linear (integrality follows from reflexivity of !) so is an integral affine manifold with singularities.
Example 3.2.
Let be the convex hull of the points
Choose a triangulation of into standard simplices; this can be done in a regular way so that the restriction of to each two-dimensional face of is as given by the light lines in Figure 1. This gives a discriminant locus depicted by the dark lines in the figure; the line segments coming out of the boundary of the two-face are meant to illustrate the pieces of discriminant locus contained in adjacent two-faces. The discriminant locus there is not contained in the plane of the two-face. In particular, the discriminant locus is not planar at the vertices of on the edges of with respect to the affine structure we define. Note is a trivalent graph, with two types of trivalent vertices, the non-planar ones just mentioned and the planar vertices contained in the interior of two-faces.
For an affine manifold, the monodromy of the local system is an important feature of the affine structure. In this example, it is very useful to analyze this monodromy around loops about the discriminant locus. If is a vertex of contained in the interior of a two-face of , one can consider loops based near in around the three line segments of adjacent to . It is an enjoyable exercise to calculate that these monodromy matrices take the form, in a suitable basis,
They are computed by studying the composition of transition maps between charts that a loop passes through. These matrices can be viewed as specifying the obstruction to extending the affine structure across a neighbourhood of in . Of course, the monodromy of is the transpose inverse of these matrices. Similarly, if is a vertex of contained in an edge of , then the monodromy will take the form
So we see that the monodromy of the two types of vertices are interchanged between and .
One main result of [20] is
Theorem 3.3.
If is a three-dimensional tropical affine manifold with singularities such that is trivalent and the monodromy of at each vertex is one of the above two types, then can be compactified to a topological fibration . Dually, can be compactified to a topological fibration . Both and are topological manifolds.
We won’t give any details here of how this is carried out, but it is not particularly difficult, as long as one restricts to the category of topological (not ) manifolds. However, it is interesting to look at the singular fibres we need to add.
If is a point which is not a vertex of , then is homeomorphic to , where denotes a Kodaira type elliptic curve, i.e., a pinched torus.
If is a vertex of , with monodromy of the first type, then , with if or , where is identified with the unit circle in . This is the three-dimensional analogue of a pinched torus, and . We call this a positive fibre.
If is a vertex of , with monodromy of the second type, then can be described as , with if or , , or . The singular locus of this fibre is a figure eight, and . We call this a negative fibre.
So we see a very concrete local consequence of SYZ duality: in the compactifications and , the positive and negative fibres are interchanged. Of course, this results in the observation that the Euler characteristic changes sign under mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau threefolds.
Example 3.4.
Continuing with Example 3.2, it was proved in [20] that is homeomorphic to the quintic and is homeomorphic to the mirror quintic. Modulo a paper [29] whose appearance has been long-delayed because of other, more pressing, projects, the results of [22] imply that the SYZ conjecture holds for all complete intersections in toric varieties at a topological level.
W.-D. Ruan in [69] gave a description of Lagrangian torus fibrations for hypersurfaces in toric varieties using a symplectic flow argument, and his construction should coincide with a symplectic compactification of the symplectic manifolds . In the three-dimensional case, such a symplectic compactification has been constructed by Ricardo Castaño-Bernard and Diego Matessi [8]. If this compactification is applied to the affine manifolds with singularities described here, the resulting symplectic manifolds should be symplectomorphic to the corresponding toric hypersurface, but this has not yet been shown.