ScalingStacks

2. Formulation of the SYZ conjecture [0202]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2. Formulation of the SYZ conjecture

In the summer of 1996, Strominger, Yau and Zaslow [153] made a ground-breaking proposal which gave the first geometric explanation for mirror symmetry:

Conjecture 2.1 (The SYZ conjecture [153]).

Suppose that XX and Xˇ\check{X} are Calabi-Yau manifolds mirror to each other. Then

  • (i)

    both XX and Xˇ\check{X} admit special Lagrangian torus fibrations with sections μ:X→B\mu:X\to B and μˇ:Xˇ→B\check{\mu}:\check{X}\to B over the same base:

    X\textstyle{X\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}μ\scriptstyle{\mu}Xˇ\textstyle{{\check{X}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}μˇ\scriptstyle{\check{\mu}}B\textstyle{{B}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}B\textstyle{{B}}
  • (ii)

    the fibrations μ:X→B\mu:X\to B and μˇ:Xˇ→B\check{\mu}:\check{X}\to B are fiberwise dual to each other in the sense that if the fibers μ−1​(b)⊂X\mu^{-1}(b)\subset X and μˇ−1​(b)⊂Xˇ\check{\mu}^{-1}(b)\subset\check{X} over b∈Bb\in B are nonsingular, then they are dual tori; and

  • (iii)

    there exist fiberwise Fourier(-Mukai)–type transforms which are responsible for the interchange between the symplectic-geometric (resp. complex-geometric) data on XX and the complex-geometric (resp. symplectic-geometric) data on Xˇ\check{X}.

In a nutshell, this is saying that the mysterious mirror phenomenon is simply a Fourier transform! This remarkable and far-reaching conjecture not only provides a beautiful geometric explanation to mirror symmetry, but also suggests that a mirror partner of any given Calabi-Yau manifold XX can be constructed by fiberwise dualizing a special Lagrangian torus fibration on XX (or TT-duality). It immediately attracted much attention from both mathematicians and physicists, and has lead to a flourishing of research work aiming at either solving the conjecture or applying it to understand the geometry underlying mirror symmetry.

Before going on, let us go through briefly the heuristic arguments behind the SYZ conjecture. First of all, a key feature in string theory is the existence of Dirichlet branes, or D-branes. Physical arguments suggest that D-branes in the B-model (or simply B-branes) are coherent sheaves over complex subvarieties while D-branes in the A-model (or A-branes) are special Lagrangian submanifolds equipped with flat connections. As mirror symmetry predicts an isomorphism between the A-model of XX and the B-model of Xˇ\check{X}, the moduli space of an A-brane on XX should be identified with the moduli space of the mirror B-brane on Xˇ\check{X}.

Now, points on Xˇ\check{X} can certainly be regarded as B-branes. And as Xˇ\check{X} itself is the moduli space these B-branes, it should be identified with the moduli space of certain A-branes (L,∇)(L,\nabla) on XX, where L⊂XL\subset X is a special Lagrangian submanifold and ∇\nabla is a flat U⁡(1)U(1)-connection on LL. Also, since Xˇ\check{X} is swept by its points, XX should be swept by these special Lagrangian submanifolds LL as well. By McLean’s theorem [126], the moduli space of a special Lagrangian submanifold L⊂XL\subset X is unobstructed and modelled on H1​(L,ℝ)H^{1}(L;\mathbb{R}), while the moduli space of flat U⁡(1)U(1)-connections (modulo gauge) on LL is given by H1​(L,ℝ)/H1​(L,ℤ)H^{1}(L;\mathbb{R})/H^{1}(L;\mathbb{Z}). Therefore, in order to match the dimensions, we should have dim ​H1​(L,ℝ)=dimℂ​Xˇ=n\textrm{dim }H^{1}(L;\mathbb{R})=\textrm{dim}_{\mathbb{C}}\check{X}=n. Hence XX should admit a special Lagrangian torus fibration

μ:X→B.\mu:X\to B.

Moreover, the manifold Xˇ\check{X} itself can be regarded as a B-brane whose moduli space is a singleton and it intersects each point in Xˇ\check{X} once, so the corresponding A-brane should give a special Lagrangian section σ\sigma to μ\mu with H1​(σ,ℝ)=0H^{1}(\sigma;\mathbb{R})=0. In particular, the base BB should have first Betti number b1=0b_{1}=0.

Applying the same argument to Xˇ\check{X} yields a special Lagrangian torus fibration with section

μˇ:Xˇ→Bˇ.\check{\mu}:\check{X}\to\check{B}.

Now for a torus fiber Lb:=μ−1​(b)⊂XL_{b}:=\mu^{-1}(b)\subset X, its dual Lb∨L_{b}^{\vee} can be viewed as the moduli space of flat U⁡(1)U(1)-connections on LL which, under mirror symmetry, correspond to points in Xˇ\check{X}. This shows that Lb∨L_{b}^{\vee} is a submanifold in Xˇ\check{X}. With more elaborated arguments, one can see that Lb∨L_{b}^{\vee} can in fact be identified with a special Lagrangian torus fiber of μˇ\check{\mu}, and hence deduce that μ\mu and μˇ\check{\mu} are fibrations over the same base which are fiberwise dual to each other.

Notice that we have a transform carrying special Lagrangian torus fibers in XX (A-branes) to points in Xˇ\check{X} (B-branes). This is an instance of a fiberwise Fourier(-Mukai)–type transform. More generally, there should exist geometric Fourier transforms mapping symplectic-geometric data on XX to complex-geometric data on Xˇ\check{X}. We call these SYZ transforms. In the original SYZ paper [153], it was inferred that the behavior of the Ricci-flat metrics on the mirror Xˇ\check{X} should differ from the semi-flat Calabi-Yau metrics, constructed earlier by Greene, Shapere, Vafa and Yau in an important paper [64], by contributions from instanton corrections. As we shall see, a key step in the investigation of mirror symmetry is to understand these corrections, which should come from higher Fourier modes of the SYZ transforms.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.