ScalingStacks

Proof. [059S]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Note that we do not assume τ¯∈𝔇\bar{\tau}\in\mathfrak{D}. But by passing to the formal open subscheme of 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} consisting of the formal open subsets 𝔘\mathfrak{U} with S⁡(𝔘)=τ¯S(\mathfrak{U})=\bar{\tau}, we may assume Δ=τ¯\Delta=\bar{\tau} and then the polytopal subdivision 𝔇′\mathfrak{D}^{\prime} consisting the polytope τ¯\bar{\tau} and its faces is suitable for hh. The corresponding formal scheme is 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}. Let D′D^{\prime} be the Cartier divisor on 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} induced by hh as in Proposition 2.11. Notice that by construction we have D=ι∗​D′D=\iota^{\ast}D^{\prime}. Now ι\iota is proper by [Tem00, Corollary 4.4] (the result requires 𝔛′′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime} to be admissible but by [Gro65, Proposition 2.7.1] it is enough to check properness after base change to the completion of an algebraic closure of KK, after which 𝔛′′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime} is always admissible, see Construction 2.6). Hence the projection formula yields deg(D.Y)=deg(D′.ι∗Y)\Deg(D.Y)=\Deg(D^{\prime}.\iota_{\ast}Y). Now

ι⁡(Y)⊆ι⁡(red𝔛′′⁡(p𝔛′′−1​(τ)))=red𝔛′⁡(p𝔛′−1​(τ)),\iota(Y)\subseteq\iota(\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime}}(p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime}}^{-1}(\tau)))=\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}(p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(\tau)),

where the latter is the stratum in 𝔛~′\tilde{\mathfrak{X}}^{\prime} corresponding to τ\tau and hence a point. Therefore D′.ι∗​Y=0D^{\prime}.\iota_{\ast}Y=0. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.