ScalingStacks

Definition 2.3 . [059B]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Definition 2.3.

For n∈ℕ>0n\in\mathbb{N}_{>0} and a∈K∘⁣∘a\in K^{\circ\circ} we define

𝔛⁡(n,a):=Spf⁡(K∘​⟨x0,…,xn⟩/(x0​…​xn−a)).\mathfrak{X}(n,a):=\Spf(K^{\circ}\langle x_{0},...,x_{n}\rangle/(x_{0}...x_{n}-a)).

For tuples 𝒏=(n0,…,np)∈ℕ>0p+1\boldsymbol{n}=(n_{0},...,n_{p})\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}^{p+1} and 𝒂=(a0,…,ap)∈(K∘⁣∘)p+1\boldsymbol{a}=(a_{0},...,a_{p})\in(K^{\circ\circ})^{p+1} we define 𝔛(𝒏,𝒂):=𝔛(n0,a0)×K∘…×K∘𝔛(np,ap)\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a}):=\mathfrak{X}(n_{0},a_{0})\times_{K^{\circ}}...\times_{K^{\circ}}\mathfrak{X}(n_{p},a_{p}) and for m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N} we set 𝔛⁡(m):=𝔛⁡(m,1)\mathfrak{X}(m):=\mathfrak{X}(m,1). A strictly polystable formal scheme over K∘K^{\circ} is an admissible formal scheme 𝔛\mathfrak{X} over K∘K^{\circ} which can be covered by formal open sets 𝔘\mathfrak{U} with étale morphisms

ψ:𝔘→𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂,m):=𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂)×K∘𝔛⁡(m)\psi:\mathfrak{U}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a},m):=\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a})\times_{K^{\circ}}\mathfrak{X}(m)

where 𝒏\boldsymbol{n}, 𝒂\boldsymbol{a} and mm may depend on 𝔘\mathfrak{U}. We say that 𝔛\mathfrak{X} is strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable if all aia_{i} can be chosen nonzero.

To a strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable formal scheme 𝔛\mathfrak{X} over K∘K^{\circ} Berkovich introduced in [Ber99] a canonical polytopal subset S⁡(𝔛)S(\mathfrak{X}) of 𝔛an\mathfrak{X}^{\textup{an}} called the skeleton. It is a closed subset of 𝔛an\mathfrak{X}^{\textup{an}} which is locally given by canonical polysimplices and can be described as follows. Let ψ:𝔘→𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂,m)\psi:\mathfrak{U}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a},m) be an étale morphism as above. The generic fibre of the right hand side is given as 𝔛​(𝒏,𝒂,m)an=ℳ⁡(A)\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a},m)^{\textup{an}}=\mathscr{M}(A) where A=(K⁡⟨T0±,…,Tm±⟩)​⟨T00,…,Tp,np⟩/(T00​…​T0,n0−a0,…,Tp​0​…​Tp,np−ap)A=(K\langle T_{0}^{\pm},...,T_{m}^{\pm}\rangle)\langle T_{00},...,T_{p,n_{p}}\rangle/(T_{00}...T_{0,n_{0}}-a_{0},...,T_{p0}...T_{p,n_{p}}-a_{p}). The elements of AA can be expressed as ∑μaμ​Tμ\sum_{\mu}a_{\mu}T^{\mu} with aμ∈K⁡⟨T0±,…,Tm±⟩a_{\mu}\in K\langle T_{0}^{\pm},...,T_{m}^{\pm}\rangle and aμ=0a_{\mu}=0 if there is an i∈{0,…,p}i\in\{0,...,p\} such that μi,k≥1\mu_{i,k}\geq 1 for all k∈{0,…,ni}k\in\{0,...,n_{i}\}. Now to an element 𝒕\boldsymbol{t} in the polysimplex {𝒕∈ℝ≥0𝒏+𝟏|ti​0+…+ti​ni=−log(|ai|),0≤i≤p}\left\{\boldsymbol{t}\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^{\boldsymbol{n}+\boldsymbol{1}}\;\Big|\;t_{i0}+...+t_{in_{i}}=-\log(|a_{i}|),0\leq i\leq p\right\} we associate a seminorm on AA by sending a power series as above to maxμ{|aμ|exp(−𝒕⋅μ)}\max_{\mu}\{|a_{\mu}|\exp(-\boldsymbol{t}\cdot\mu)\}. This gives an embedding of the polysimplex into ℳ⁡(A)\mathscr{M}(A) whose image is denoted by Δ\Delta. The skeleton S⁡(𝔘)S(\mathfrak{U}) of 𝔘\mathfrak{U} is defined to be (ψan)−1​(Δ)(\psi^{\textup{an}})^{-1}(\Delta). One can show that ψan\psi^{\textup{an}} induces a homeomorphism from (ψan)−1​(Δ)(\psi^{\textup{an}})^{-1}(\Delta) to Δ\Delta if 𝔘\mathfrak{U} has a unique minimal stratum which maps to the minimal stratum of 𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂,m)\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a},m). The skeleton S⁡(𝔛)S(\mathfrak{X}) of 𝔛\mathfrak{X} is the union of all S⁡(𝔘)S(\mathfrak{U}) and is independent of all choices.

To a stratum SS of 𝔛\mathfrak{X} one can associate a canonical polysimplex ΔS\Delta_{S} in the skeleton such that the interiors of the ΔT\Delta_{T} form a disjoint cover of S⁡(𝔛)S(\mathfrak{X}) where TT ranges over all strata of 𝔛~\tilde{\mathfrak{X}}. In order to do so, we choose a refinement of the cover of 𝔛\mathfrak{X} as described in the Proposition below and choose 𝔘\mathfrak{U} such that SS is its distinguished stratum. We then define ΔS:=S⁡(𝔘)\Delta_{S}:=S(\mathfrak{U}).

An admissible formal scheme 𝔛\mathfrak{X} is called strongly nondegenerate polystable if there exists a strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable formal scheme 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} and a surjective étale morphism 𝔛′→𝔛\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}. The skeleton of 𝔛\mathfrak{X} is defined to be the image of the skeleton of 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} under the map 𝔛′an→𝔛an\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\textup{an}}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}^{\textup{an}}.

One can endow the skeleton with a piecewise linear structure, see [Ber04, §6]. We will define piecewise affine linear functions on the skeleton of a strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable formal scheme in Definition 2.10. There is a canonical continuous retraction map p𝔛:𝔛an→S⁡(𝔛)p_{\mathfrak{X}}:\mathfrak{X}^{\textup{an}}\rightarrow S(\mathfrak{X}) which restricts to the identity on S⁡(𝔛)S(\mathfrak{X}). For details see [Ber99, §4], [Ber04, §4] or [Gub10, 5.3].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.