ScalingStacks

3.1 The connect sum [058I]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.1 The connect sum

Suppose we have two Lagrangians L1,L2L_{1},\,L_{2} hamiltonian isotoped to intersect transversally in a finite number of points. We will work at one of these points pp. There we can pick a local Darboux chart with coordinates (xi,yi)(x_{i},y_{i}) and symplectic form ∑id​xi∧d​yi\sum_{i}dx_{i}\wedge dy_{i} such that L2={yi=0}L_{2}=\{y_{i}=0\} is the xx-axes, and

L1={yi=tan(α)xi}L_{1}=\{y_{i}=\tan(\alpha)x_{i}\} (3.1)

for some α∈(0,π)\alpha\in(0,\pi). (It would be more usual to use α=π/2\alpha=\pi/2, of course, but that situation can be moved to this one by an obvious symplectic (shear) transformation).

Using zi=xi+i​yiz_{i}=x_{i}+iy_{i} coordinates to set up the obvious isomorphism to ℂn\mathbb{C}\,^{n}, L1L_{1} and L2L_{2} are at

L={zj=rei​αaj:r∈[0,∞),𝐚=(aj)j=1n∈Sn−1⊂ℝn⊂ℂn},L=\{z_{j}=re^{i\alpha}a_{j}\,:\,r\in[0,\infty),\,\mathbf{a}=(a_{j})_{j=1}^{n}\in S^{n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}\subset\mathbb{C}\,^{n}\},

where α\alpha is set to zero to give L2L_{2}.

So given a curve γ\gamma in ℂ\mathbb{C}\,, we define a Lagrangian

Lγ=γ.Sn−1={zj=γ​aj:𝐚=(aj)j=1n∈Sn−1⊂ℝn⊂ℂn}.L_{\gamma}=\gamma.S^{n-1}=\{z_{j}=\gamma a_{j}\,:\,\mathbf{a}=(a_{j})_{j=1}^{n}\in S^{n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}\subset\mathbb{C}\,^{n}\}.

Then L2L_{2} is represented by γ2=[0,∞)⊂ℂ\gamma_{2}=[0,\infty)\subset\mathbb{C}\,, L1L_{1} by γ1=ei​α[0,∞)⊂ℂ\gamma_{1}=e^{i\alpha}[0,\infty)\subset\mathbb{C}\,, and L1∪L2L_{1}\cup L_{2} by the V-shaped union of these curves.

In this notation the Lagrangian connect sum L1​#​L2L_{1}\#L_{2} is represented by any smoothing γ=:γ1​#​γ2\gamma=:\gamma_{1}\#\gamma_{2} of γ1∪γ2\gamma_{1}\cup\gamma_{2} staying inside the cone {rei​β:r>0,β∈[0,α]}\{re^{i\beta}\,:\,r>0,\beta\in[0,\alpha]\} which is γ1∪γ2\gamma_{1}\cup\gamma_{2} outside a compact set, and a smooth curve cutting off the cone at the origin. (So here γ\gamma is not a connect sum of the curves γi\gamma_{i} in the topological sense; we only use the notation because the resulting Lagrangians are topological connect sums.)

Now suppose we are in the special case that we can choose α\alpha such that in these coordinates, Ω|p\Omega\arrowvert_{p} takes the standard form d​z1​…​d​zndz_{1}\ldots dz_{n}. Then the phase function of the Lagrangian LγL_{\gamma} associated to a curve γ\gamma is easily calculated to be θ⁡(γ′)+(n−1)​θ​(γ)+N​π\theta(\gamma^{\prime})+(n-1)\theta(\gamma)+N\pi for any N∈ℤN\in\mathbb{Z} (where θ(z)∈(−π,π]\theta(z)\in(-\pi,\pi] is the phase of a complex number z=r​ei​θ​(z)z=re^{i\theta(z)}). Orienting γ2\gamma_{2} such that γ2′\gamma_{2}^{\prime} is a positive real number, and choosing L2L_{2} to have phase 0, corresponds to choosing N=0N=0 and so grading L1L_{1} by

(−π+α)+(n−1)​α=n​α−π.(-\pi+\alpha)+(n-1)\alpha=n\alpha-\pi. (3.2)

In particular, choosing α=π/n\alpha=\pi/n, and setting, for any c>0c>0,

γc={rei​θ:rn=csin(nθ),θ∈(0,π/n)}\gamma^{\ }_{c}=\{re^{i\theta}\,:\,r^{n}=c\sin(n\theta),\ \theta\in(0,\pi/n)\}

gives a SLag LγL_{\gamma} which has a grading of phase zero, asymptotic to L1L_{1} and L2L_{2} at infinity, and this is precisely the local model of the example of Joyce, Harvey and Lawlor used so extensively in [Th].

While this is not strictly of the form γ1​#​γ2\gamma_{1}\#\gamma_{2} as defined above (it is only asymptotic to the γi\gamma_{i}, not equal outside a compact set), by taking cc small we can make it as close as we like to such a connect sum, all in the same hamiltonian deformation class, and the construction of Joyce is indeed a hamiltonian deformation of a connect sum as claimed in [Th].

We plot these SLag curves γc⊂ℂ\gamma_{c}\subset\mathbb{C}\, in Figure 1 as the light lines, converging as c→0c\to 0 to the V-shaped γ1∪γ2\gamma_{1}\cup\gamma_{2} (with α=π/n\alpha=\pi/n). Then the dark lines depict connect sums L1​#​L2L_{1}\#L_{2} for ϕ⁡(L2)=0\phi(L_{2})=0 and ϕ⁡(L1)=±ϵ\phi(L_{1})=\pm\epsilon. If ϕ⁡(L1)<0\phi(L_{1})<0, the stable case as described in [Th], then we can choose the connect sum such that the phase of L1​#​L2L_{1}\#L_{2} varies monotonically between its values on L1L_{1} and L2L_{2}, i.e. between −ϵ-\epsilon and ϵ\epsilon.

= ϕ ( L 2 ) 0 π n L 2 θ = ϕ ( L 1 ) ϵ = ϕ ( L 1 ) - ϵ ϵ 0 - ϵ = ϕ ( L 1 ) - ϵ = ϕ ( L 1 ) ϵ γ 2 γ 1
Figure 1: γ1​#​γ2\gamma_{1}\#\gamma_{2}, and the resulting phase function θL1​#​L2\theta_{L_{1}\#L_{2}}, for ϕ⁡(L1)=±ϵ\phi(L_{1})=\pm\epsilon

If, however, ϕ⁡(L1)>0\phi(L_{1})>0, the unstable case in [Th], then the phase of L1​#​L2L_{1}\#L_{2} must initially decrease to move away from L1L_{1} before decreasing to reach L2L_{2} (i.e. γ\gamma must cross the light lines one way then the other), giving a phase function which necessarily goes outside the range (0,ϵ)(0,\epsilon) (see Figure 1). This will be important to us later – under mean curvature flow we expect the phase function θ\theta to evolve to a constant in the stable case (under the heat equation (2.5)) and to a Heaviside step function (with values 00 and ϵ\epsilon) in the unstable case. This does not then contradict the maximum principle as the unstable case has the described non-monotonic phase.

While this defines the symplectic connect sum in general by means of our Darboux chart, the analysis of phases depended on a choice of complex structure. In the general case we can still fix θp​(L2)=0\theta_{p}(L_{2})=0, without loss of generality, by rotating Ω\Omega. We can then pick local complex coordinates zi=xi+i​yiz_{i}=x_{i}+iy_{i} such that Ωp=d​z1​…​d​zn\Omega_{p}=dz_{1}\ldots dz_{n} and, at the level of tangent spaces at pp, (the tangent space to) L2L_{2} is at yi=0​∀iy_{i}=0\ \forall i. L1L_{1} will be

L1={zi=rei​αi},L_{1}=\{z_{i}=re^{i\alpha_{i}}\}, (3.3)

for some αi\alpha_{i}s that are no longer necessarily all the same. We are now connect summing Lagrangians of pointwise phase 00 and ∑i=1n(αi)−π\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\alpha_{i})-\pi (compare (3.2)). To do so we of course have to pick different coordinates as in the original definition above (3.1) and proceed as before; therefore the resulting phase function will not be as simple as before – it is not pulled back from γ\gamma but will vary over the Sn−1S^{n-1} fibres. Its average phase over the Sn−1S^{n-1}s will have a similar form to that in Figure 1, however, and in the case of all the αi\alpha_{i}s being the same we get the earlier simpler picture.

The dependence of the hamiltonian deformation class of L1​#​L2L_{1}\#L_{2} on the choice of scale of the neck at each intersection point was described in ([Th] Section 4) (in particular if there is only one intersection point the class is uniquely defined). We should also point out that the graded connect sum (when it exists) is also independent of hamiltonian deformations of L1L_{1} and L2L_{2}. While the LiL_{i}s intersect transversely this is clear; we need only understand what happens in crossing the codimension one wall of Lagrangians intersecting in a double point (i.e. creating or cancelling two intersection points). But it will be clear from the definition of grading below that two such points must have grading differing by one, and so the connect sum along both of them cannot be graded (3.5).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.