ScalingStacks

Proof. [03FR]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We consider the bi-PIKAS family in a neighborhood of (λ0,ν0)(\lambda_{0},\nu_{0}) and extend it by rescaling to (a neighborhood of) the ray (λ,ν)=(log⁡|a|+log⁡|s|⋅λ0,ν0log⁡|s|)(\lambda,\nu)=\left(\log|a|+\log|s|\cdot\lambda_{0},\frac{\nu_{0}}{\log|s|}\right) in SC⁡(S)×SC⁡(T)\operatorname{SC}(S)\times\operatorname{SC}(T).

The CiC_{i}-estimates for the (λ,ν)(\lambda,\nu) bi-PIKAS considered in the bi-PIKAS metric (rather than in Euclidean) are equivalent to the corresponding estimates for the rescaled structure ((log⁡|s|)−1​λ,log⁡|s|​ν)((\log|s|)^{-1}\lambda,\log|s|\nu) made in the Euclidean metric as before. This is because the Euclidean metric on ∂Δλ0\partial\Delta_{\lambda_{0}} is equivalent to the bi-PIKAS metric on Σ\Sigma. But to pass from (λ,ν)(\lambda,\nu) to ((log⁡|s|)−1​λ,log⁡|s|​ν)((\log|s|)^{-1}\lambda,\log|s|\nu) we will need to rescale all the parameters as well:

λ∼λ0​log​|s|,β∼β0​log​|s|,γ∼γ0​log​|s|,h∼h0​log​|s|,c∼c0​log​|s|,\displaystyle\lambda\sim\lambda_{0}\log|s|,\ \beta\sim\beta_{0}\log|s|,\ \gamma\sim\gamma_{0}\log|s|,\ h\sim h_{0}\log|s|,\ c\sim c_{0}\log|s|,
ν∼ν0log⁡|s|,β∨∼β0∨log⁡|s|,Hess⁡Φ∼Hess⁡Φ0(log⁡|s|)2.\displaystyle\nu\sim\frac{\nu_{0}}{\log|s|},\ \beta^{\vee}\sim\frac{\beta^{\vee}_{0}}{\log|s|},\ \operatorname{Hess}\Phi\sim\frac{\operatorname{Hess}\Phi_{0}}{(\log|s|)^{2}}.

Or equivalently, we could apply the log map with the base |s||s| as in [HZ02].

We saw in the proof of Lemma 4.4 that Hess⁡Φλ0+γ0sm\operatorname{Hess}\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}}_{\lambda_{0}+\gamma_{0}} is degenerate along ℱ\mathcal{F} outside Δλ0+γ0+h0∨\Delta^{\vee}_{\lambda_{0}+\gamma_{0}+h_{0}}. This argument extended to the entire toric variety shows that up to terms of order O⁡(ϵ)O(\epsilon), the set XT\log−1⁡(Δλ0+γ0+h0∨)X_{T}\backslash\log^{-1}(\Delta^{\vee}_{\lambda_{0}+\gamma_{0}+h_{0}}) (which contains ZsZ_{s}) has distance from ∂Δλ∨\partial\Delta^{\vee}_{\lambda} bounded by the diameters of the torus fibers 𝕋\mathbb{T}. The size of the tori 𝕋\mathbb{T} is determined by the norm of Hess⁡Φλ+γsm\operatorname{Hess}\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}}_{\lambda+\gamma} at the corresponding point, which is bounded by C1​(γ0)(log⁡|s|)2\frac{C_{1}(\gamma_{0})}{(\log|s|)^{2}}.

The rest of the proof consists of careful picks for asymptotics of the rescaled parameters β0,β0∨,h,γ0,c0,ϵ\beta_{0},\beta^{\vee}_{0},h,\gamma_{0},c_{0},\epsilon to ensure that the following expressions

β0,β0∨,γ0,c0,h0,\displaystyle\beta_{0},\quad\beta^{\vee}_{0},\quad\gamma_{0},\quad c_{0},\quad h_{0},
C1​(γ0)​(log⁡|s|)−2,\displaystyle C_{1}(\gamma_{0})(\log|s|)^{-2},
log⁡|s|​1β0∨​e−β0​log⁡|s|⋅C0​(β0),\displaystyle\log|s|\frac{1}{\beta^{\vee}_{0}}e^{-\beta_{0}\log|s|}\cdot C_{0}(\beta_{0}),
log⁡|s|​C0​(β0)​C1​(γ0)β0∨​e−β0​log⁡|s|+C2​(γ0)+C3​(h0)\displaystyle\log|s|\frac{C_{0}(\beta_{0})C_{1}(\gamma_{0})}{\beta^{\vee}_{0}}e^{-\beta_{0}\log|s|}+C_{2}(\gamma_{0})+C_{3}(h_{0})
+C4​(γ0)+C5​(β0,c0)+O⁡(ϵ)​(log⁡|s|)2\displaystyle\hskip 144.54pt+C_{4}(\gamma_{0})+C_{5}(\beta_{0},c_{0})+O(\epsilon)(\log|s|)^{2}

go to 0 as log⁡|s|→∞\log|s|\to\infty, where the first two lines take care of the Hausdorff convergence, and the last two give matching of the complex structure and the metric under the embedding ψ:Zssm→Ws\psi:Z^{\mathrm{sm}}_{s}\to W_{s}

For instance, we can choose

β0∨∼1log⁡|s|,γ0∼C1−1​(log⁡|s|),c0∼1log⁡|s|,h0∼1log⁡|s|.\beta^{\vee}_{0}\sim\frac{1}{\log|s|},\quad\gamma_{0}\sim C_{1}^{-1}(\log|s|),\quad c_{0}\sim\frac{1}{\log|s|},\quad h_{0}\sim\frac{1}{\log|s|}.

And β0​(log⁡|s|)\beta_{0}(\log|s|) has satisfy C1​(1log⁡|s|​e−β0​log⁡|s|)<log⁡|s|C_{1}(\frac{1}{\log|s|}e^{-\beta_{0}\log|s|})<\log|s| (i.e. e−β<γe^{-\beta}<\gamma, which is needed for the proof of Lemma 4.4) and

(log⁡|s|)3​C0​(β0)​e−β0​log⁡|s|→0,(\log|s|)^{3}C_{0}(\beta_{0})e^{-\beta_{0}\log|s|}\to 0,

which is possible due to the fast decreasing factor of e−β0​log⁡|s|e^{-\beta_{0}\log|s|} when β0​(log⁡|s|)\beta_{0}(\log|s|) is changing slowly.

Finally, notice that the bi-PIKAS of type ((log⁡|s|)−1⋅λ,log⁡|s|⋅ν)=(λ0+(log⁡|s|)−1​log​|a|,ν0)((\log|s|)^{-1}\cdot\lambda,\log|s|\cdot\nu)=(\lambda_{0}+(\log|s|)^{-1}\log|a|,\nu_{0}) converges to the (λ0,ν0)(\lambda_{0},\nu_{0})-bi-PIKAS. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.