Proof. [03FC]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
First, we rewrite the form on as
where ”” means also the -pairing between the -valued gradient and the -valued 1-form .
For a simplex we want to show that extends to the toric subvariety associated to . If is smooth, then in a neighborhood of we can choose the coordinates similar to those from [HZ02, Lemma 3.9]. That is, we choose a basis such that
Then, in the coordinates the equations for the subvariety are .
According to the theory of toric varieties (cf., e.g. [Ful93]) a neighborhood of the toric subvariety lies in the closure of , where is any translation of the cone . But by the Lemma 3.3 the directional derivatives , , are constant in some translation of . Hence, in a neighborhood of the form written in the above coordinates is independent of , and, thus, can be extended to .
In case when is an orbifold we may not be able to choose an integral basis with the above conditions. This corresponds to the fact that we may need to go to a finite cover to get a smooth form by weakening the first set of conditions to be . But the rest of the argument goes through.
Finally, the cohomology class of a -invariant -form on a complete toric variety is determined by the image of its moment map. But the moment map for is given on by
whose extension to the whole toric variety has the image . Hence the class of is . ∎