ScalingStacks

Proof. [03FC]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

First, we rewrite the form η\eta on (ℂ\{0})d(\mathbb{C}\backslash\{0\})^{d} as

η=−12​π​∂∂¯​Φsm​(log⁡|z|)=⟨d⁡(∇Φsm​(log⁡|z|))∧d​Arg⁡(z)⟩,\eta=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2\pi}\partial\bar{\partial}\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}}\left(\log|z|\right)=\left\langle d\left(\nabla\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}}\left(\log|z|\right)\right)\wedge d\operatorname{Arg}(z)\right\rangle,

where ”⟨∧⟩\langle\ \wedge\ \rangle” means also the ⟨,⟩\langle\ ,\ \rangle-pairing between the (ℝd)∗(\mathbb{R}^{d})^{*}-valued gradient ∇Φsm\nabla\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}} and the ℝd\mathbb{R}^{d}-valued 1-form d​Arg⁡(z)d\operatorname{Arg}(z).

For a simplex τ∈T\tau\in T we want to show that η\eta extends to the toric subvariety ZτZ_{\tau} associated to τ\tau. If XTX_{T} is smooth, then in a neighborhood of ZτZ_{\tau} we can choose the coordinates similar to those from [HZ02, Lemma 3.9]. That is, we choose a basis {ei}\{e_{i}\} such that

⟨ei,wj⟩=−δi​j,i=1,…,dimτ+1 and ⟨ei,τ⟩=0,i=dimτ+2,…,d.\langle e_{i},w_{j}\rangle=-\delta_{ij},i=1,\dots,\dim\tau+1\text{ and }\langle e_{i},\tau\rangle=0,i=\dim\tau+2,\dots,d.

Then, in the coordinates yi=zeiy_{i}=z^{e_{i}} the equations for the subvariety Zτ⊂XTZ_{\tau}\subset X_{T} are yi=0,i=1,…,dimτ+1y_{i}=0,i=1,\dots,\dim\tau+1.

According to the theory of toric varieties (cf., e.g. [Ful93]) a neighborhood of the toric subvariety ZτZ_{\tau} lies in the closure of log−1⁡(R≥τ)\log^{-1}(R_{\geq\tau}), where R≥τR_{\geq\tau} is any translation of the cone ∪τ′≥τcone(τ′)\cup_{\tau^{\prime}\geq\tau}\operatorname{cone}(\tau^{\prime}). But by the Lemma 3.3 the directional derivatives ⟨∇Φsm,wi⟩\langle\nabla\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}},w_{i}\rangle, wi∈τw_{i}\in\tau, are constant in some translation R≥τR_{\geq\tau} of ∪τ′≥τcone(τ′)\cup_{\tau^{\prime}\geq\tau}\operatorname{cone}(\tau^{\prime}). Hence, in a neighborhood of ZτZ_{\tau} the form ηa\eta_{a} written in the above coordinates is independent of yi,i=1,…,dimτ+1y_{i},i=1,\dots,\dim\tau+1, and, thus, can be extended to ZτZ_{\tau}.

In case when XTX_{T} is an orbifold we may not be able to choose an integral basis {ei}\{e_{i}\} with the above conditions. This corresponds to the fact that we may need to go to a finite cover to get a smooth form by weakening the first set of conditions to be ⟨ei,τ⟩∈ℤ\langle e_{i},\tau\rangle\in\mathbb{Z}. But the rest of the argument goes through.

Finally, the cohomology class of a 𝕋\mathbb{T}-invariant (1,1)(1,1)-form on a complete toric variety is determined by the image of its moment map. But the moment map for η\eta is given on (ℂ\{0})d(\mathbb{C}\backslash\{0\})^{d} by

μ⁡(z)=∇Φsm​(log⁡|z|),\mu(z)=\nabla\Phi^{\mathrm{sm}}\left(\log|z|\right),

whose extension to the whole toric variety XTX_{T} has the image Δν{\Delta_{\nu}}. Hence the class of η\eta is [ν][\nu]. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.