Proof. [03EV]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
First, we choose a smooth function with positive Hessian on whose gradients stay in , and cover .
![[Uncaptioned image]](https://arxiv.org/html/math/0301222v1/exist1.png)
Figure 1: The domain for the first step. The set of gradients.
As a second step, we need a continuous strictly convex function on that is an approximation of the function with the following properties.
- •
is piecewise smooth.
- •
on the smooth pieces.
- •
The gradients along belong to a neighborhood of the corresponding vertex in that are pairwise disjoint, and do not meet the neighborhood of the barycenter of .
- •
For a vertex , the -directional derivatives equal in the star neighborhood of in the barycentric subdivision of .
Figure 2: The set of gradients of .
We obtain a convex function on if we consider the lower hull of the ()-dimensional Minkowski sum of graphs of the two functions.
Finally, we want to obtain a function that is smooth along the strata. As explained in § 3.2, we convolute with a kernel that depends on the position as follows. Consider the quadratic form
This quadratic form is non-degenerate because the ’s span . It has a dominant summand if is close to a facet. Now our kernel will be a normalized . Its support – the ellipsoid given by – depends on the position as sketched in the figure.
Figure 3: The support of the mollifier.
The obtained function will have a positive Hessian along the strata, so that the Legendre dual function will be smooth along its corresponding strata. ∎