Proof. [032P]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
It follows straightforwardly from proposition 1.6.1 that is a relatively compact subset of . Moreover is closed by Hartogs lemma (1.6.2).
Let . Then which is relatively compact. Assume first is smooth. Then is bounded: this is because if in then in the weak sense of (negative) measures hence . Now thus is bounded and we can apply the previous proposition to conclude that is relatively compact ( it cannot converge uniformly to since ).
When is not smooth, it only remains to prove that is bounded. Assume on the contrary that . Extracting a subsequence if necessary we can assume . Set . This is a decreasing sequence of -psh functions, hence or . Now it follows from the previous discussion that if denotes some smooth probability measure on . Thus hence . We obtain a contradiction since by the Monotone convergence theorem, . ∎