ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0905.4718v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

We now show the left-hand side inequality in (2.9). To this extent we apply the maximum principle to the quantity

K1=e−B​σh−λ​(log⁡(t⋅trω~t​ωX)−At​(φt−φt¯)),K_{1}=e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}_{h}}\left(\log(t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})-\frac{A}{t}(\varphi_{t}-\underline{\varphi_{t}})\right),

where AA is a suitably chosen uniform large constant. The maximum of K1K_{1} on X\SX\backslash S is obviously achieved, and we will show that K1≤CK_{1}\leq C for a uniform constant CC. This together with (3.9) will show that on X\SX\backslash S we have

(3.24) trω~t​ωX≤Ct​eC​eB​σ−λ,\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}\leq\frac{C}{t}e^{Ce^{B\sigma^{-\lambda}}},

which is the other half of (2.9). To prove that K1≤CK_{1}\leq C we use the maximum principle and, as in (3.16), we compute

(3.25) Δω~t​K1≥e−B​σ−λ​(trω~t​ωX−Ct−C​σ−λ)+(log⁡(t⋅trω~t​ωX)−At​(φt−φt¯))​Δω~t​(e−B​σ−λ)+2​eB​σ−λ​Re​⟨∇K1,∇e−B​σ−λ⟩ω~t−2​(log⁡(t⋅trω~t​ωX)−At​(φt−φt¯))​eB​σ−λ​|∇e−B​σ−λ|ω~t2.\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}K_{1}&\geq e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\left(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}-\frac{C}{t}-C\sigma^{-\lambda}\right)\\ &+\left(\log(t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})-\frac{A}{t}(\varphi_{t}-\underline{\varphi_{t}})\right)\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\left(e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\right)\\ &+2e^{B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla K_{1},\nabla e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\\ &-2\left(\log(t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})-\frac{A}{t}(\varphi_{t}-\underline{\varphi_{t}})\right)e^{B\sigma^{-\lambda}}|\nabla e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}|^{2}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}.\end{split}

We estimate this in the same way as before and get

(3.26) Δω~t​K1≥e−B​σ−λ​(trω~t​ωX−Ct−C​σ−λ)−C​e−B​σ−λσ2​λ+2​log⁡(t⋅trω~t​ωX)−Cσ2​λ+2+2​eB​σ−λ​Re​⟨∇K1,∇e−B​σ−λ⟩ω~t.\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}K_{1}&\geq e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\left(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}-\frac{C}{t}-C\sigma^{-\lambda}\right)\\ &-C\frac{e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}}{\sigma^{2\lambda+2}}\log(t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})-\frac{C}{\sigma^{2\lambda+2}}\\ &+2e^{B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla K_{1},\nabla e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}.\end{split}

At the maximum of K1K_{1} we get

0≥trω~t​ωX−Ct−Cσλ−Cσ2​λ+2​log⁡(t⋅trω~t​ωX)−C​eC​σ−λ,0\geq\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}-\frac{C}{t}-\frac{C}{\sigma^{\lambda}}-\frac{C}{\sigma^{2\lambda+2}}\log(t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})-Ce^{C\sigma^{-\lambda}},

and using the inequalities 2​a​b≤ε​a2+b2/ε2ab\leq\varepsilon a^{2}+b^{2}/\varepsilon and (log⁡x)2≤x+C(\log x)^{2}\leq x+C we get

trω~t​ωX≤Ct+Cσλ+Cσ4​λ+4+C​eC​σ−λ+12​trω~t​ωX,\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}\leq\frac{C}{t}+\frac{C}{\sigma^{\lambda}}+\frac{C}{\sigma^{4\lambda+4}}+Ce^{C\sigma^{-\lambda}}+\frac{1}{2}\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X},

whence

t⋅trω~t​ωX≤C+t​C​eC​σ−λ≤C​eC​σ−λ,t\cdot\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}\leq C+tCe^{C\sigma^{-\lambda}}\leq Ce^{C\sigma^{-\lambda}},

and so at that point

K1≤C+e−B​σ−λ​log⁡(C​eC​σ−λ)≤C,K_{1}\leq C+e^{-B\sigma^{-\lambda}}\log(Ce^{C\sigma^{-\lambda}})\leq C,

and we are done. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.