Examples 8.2 . [0306]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Examples 8.2.
(1) Let be a scheme and a closed subset of codimension one. Denote by the inclusion. Then the inclusion
of the sheaf of regular functions invertible off of is a log structure on . This is called a divisorial log structure on .
(2) A prelog structure, i.e., an arbitrary homomorphism of sheaves of monoids , defines an associated log structure by
and .
(3) If is a morphism of schemes and is a log structure on , then the prelog structure given as the composition of and defines an associated log structure on , the pull-back log structure.
(4) In (1) we can pull back the log structure on to using (3). Thus in particular, if is a toric degeneration, the inclusion gives a log structure on and an induced log structure on . Similarly the inclusion gives a log structure on and an induced one on . Here , where is the (additive) monoid of natural (non-negative) numbers, and
is usually called the standard log point.
We then have log morphisms and .
(5) If is a strictly convex rational polyhedral cone, the dual cone, let : this is a monoid under addition. The affine toric variety defined by can be written as . We then have a pre-log structure induced by the homomorphism of monoids
given by . There is then an associated log structure on . This is in fact the same as the log structure induced by , where is the toric boundary of , i.e., the union of toric divisors of .
If , then the monomial defines a map which is a log morphism with the log structure on induced similarly by . The fibre is a subscheme of , there is an induced log structure on , and a map as in (4). The log morphism is an example of a log smooth morphism. Essentially all log smooth morphisms are étale locally of this form (if is replaced by a more general monoid). See [48] for details.
Condition (4) of Definition 7.1 in fact implies that locally, away from , and are of the above form. So we should view as log smooth away from , and from the log point of view, can be treated much like a non-singular scheme away from .
(6) Given a monoid as in (5) and a morphism , we can pull back the log structure defined above on to . If is a log scheme which étale locally can be described in this way, we say is a fine saturated log scheme. The adjective “fine” tells us it is locally described via maps to schemes of the form where is a finitely generated integral monoid, i.e., the canonical homomorphism is an injection. The adjective “saturated” tells us the monoid is saturated. This means that is integral and whenever satisfies for some , . Such monoids arise, e.g., as the intersection of a rational polyhedral cone with a lattice.
Most of the literature on log geometry tends to apply only to fine log structures. In the key example of , the log structure is fine saturated away from the set . However, it is not in general fine along , and this tends to cause many technical problems as new techniques have to be developed to deal properly with the log structure along . ∎