ScalingStacks

Proof. [024P]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Pick a point q∈V~q\in\tilde{V}. Since π\pi is a log resolution, there exists an open set Z⊂U~Z\subset\tilde{U} with a coordinate system (w1,…,wn)(w_{1},\dots,w_{n}) centered at qq such that V~={w1=0}\tilde{V}=\{w_{1}=0\} and π∗​exp⁡(φ1),π∗​exp⁡(φ2)\pi^{*}\exp(\varphi_{1}),\pi^{*}\exp(\varphi_{2}) are of the form

π∗​exp⁡(φ1)\displaystyle\pi^{*}\exp(\varphi_{1}) =U1​(w1,…,wn)​∏i=2n|wi|2​αi\displaystyle=U_{1}(w_{1},\dots,w_{n})\prod_{i=2}^{n}|w_{i}|^{2\alpha_{i}}
π∗​exp⁡(φ2)\displaystyle\pi^{*}\exp(\varphi_{2}) =U2​(w1,…,wn)​∏i=2n|wi|2​βi,\displaystyle=U_{2}(w_{1},\dots,w_{n})\prod_{i=2}^{n}|w_{i}|^{2\beta_{i}},

where UjU_{j} are smooth, positive functions on Z¯\overline{Z}, and αi,βi\alpha_{i},\beta_{i} are nonnegative real numbers. That w1w_{1} does not appear in the product follows from the fact that φ1,φ2≢−∞\varphi_{1},\varphi_{2}\not\equiv-\infty on V∩UV\cap U. By definition, we have

π−1​(𝒮)∩Z={w∈Z|U1​(w)​∏i⩾2|wi|2​αi<eη​U2​(w)​∏i⩾2|wi|2​βi}.\pi^{-1}(\mathcal{S})\cap Z=\left\{w\in Z\bigg|U_{1}(w)\prod_{i\geqslant 2}|w_{i}|^{2\alpha_{i}}<e^{\eta}U_{2}(w)\prod_{i\geqslant 2}|w_{i}|^{2\beta_{i}}\right\}.

Now, since φ1|V=φ2|V\varphi_{1}|_{V}=\varphi_{2}|_{V}, and wi|V~≠0w_{i}|_{\tilde{V}}\neq 0 for i⩾2i\geqslant 2, we clearly have that αi=βi\alpha_{i}=\beta_{i}, and that U1|V~=U2|V~U_{1}|_{\tilde{V}}=U_{2}|_{\tilde{V}}. Since eη>1e^{\eta}>1, the lemma is proved. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.