Proof of the diameter lower bound in Theorem 1.1.
Thanks to Proposition 3.1, on we have
|
|
|
for some constant independent of . We then use this together with the elementary inequality to get
|
|
|
while from (2.1) we get
|
|
|
and so
| (3.4) |
|
|
|
Define two subsets of by and . Given two points which are connected by a unique minimal geodesic (w.r.t. ), we can bound
| (3.5) |
|
|
|
where is parametrized with respect to -arclength.
Combining (3.5) with Cheeger-Colding’s segment inequality [4, Theorem 2.11] applied to the function we obtain
| (3.6) |
|
|
|
where , and in the we are actually only integrating over the subset of pairs which are joined by a unique -minimal geodesic, which has full measure (cf. [4]).
Combining (3.4) and (3.6) gives
|
|
|
Lastly, from the definition of and from (3.1), a direct computation in polar coordinates (analogous to the one in [3]) gives
|
|
|
for a fixed constant , and so as desired.